My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SWSI Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities TRT Draft
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
SWSI Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities TRT Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:30:04 AM
Creation date
12/21/2007 2:11:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Technical Roundtable
Recreation & Environment
Title
SWSI - Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities White Paper
SWSI II - Doc Type
White Papers
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4. Potential Approaches to Defining Environmental and Recreational Flow <br />Enhancements <br /> <br />Since its implementation in 1973, CWCB's Instream Flow Program has been successful filing <br />water rights to protect the "minimum stream flows or natural lake levels or volumes necessary <br />to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree." The recent addition by the State <br />Legislature that granted the CWCB authority to secure instream flows that "preserve or improve <br />the natural environment" provides an opportunity to further protect flows in Colorado's rivers <br />and streams. A description of the CWCB instream flow program is attached at the end of this <br />white paper in a paper titled "Colorado's Instream Flow Program: How it Works and Why It's <br />Good for Colorado." <br /> <br />In addition, through the SWSI process, programs that go beyond CWCB's minimum flow <br />requirements could be implemented where legally, technically, politically, and economically <br />feasible. Recreational and environmental water needs are generally in-channel flow-based and <br />non-consumptive. These uses have not traditionally been a major part of water planning. <br />Today, much of the work done to address these flow-based needs is tied to agricultural or M&I <br />projects, and much of it is done solely for mitigation of those project impacts. Roundtable and <br />public participants in SWSI expressed significant interest in enhancing flows for recreational <br />and environmental needs beyond legally mandated mitigation levels. Potential solutions were <br />identified, such as RICDs, re-operation of existing facilities for flow enhancement, or dedicated <br />or multi-use projects. For example, Elkhead Reservoir enlargement in the Yampa Basin will <br />provide for water supply needs as well as a storage pool for releases for endangered species. <br />Wolcott Reservoir in the Colorado Basin, if constructed, is intended to address endangered <br />species needs through the 15-mile reach in the lower part of the Colorado River in Colorado in <br />addition to fulfilling water supply needs. This is another example of a project that can serve <br />multiple needs. <br /> <br />While flow enhancement for environmental and recreational uses was identified by many SWSI <br />participants as being important, few Identified Projects and Processes, aside from river compact <br />deliveries and the CWCB's instream flow program, directly addressing flow enhancements <br />beyond statutory legal requirements. In support of future options with multi-benefit <br />approaches, several groups provided input to SWSI as to how the state might consider <br />developing a framework for setting goals for these flows. Environmental Defense, Trout <br />Unlimited, and The Nature Conservancy (TNC) provided feedback and input on the subject, <br />and suggested that this framework should include parameters such as seasonal variability, <br />which could include occasional flood pulses, high flow periods, and steady base flows, as many <br />aquatic ecosystems benefit from these flow conditions. <br /> <br />This section provides a synopsis of the input received from these groups as a possible starting <br />point for defining environmental and recreational flow goals. Further discussion at the CWCB <br />Board and through the Basin Roundtables or similar groups will be needed to effectively assess <br />whether and how to proceed with incorporating some of these methods for use in Colorado. <br />More specific environmental and recreational options or concepts that could be pursued, as <br />brought forth through the Basin Roundtable process and public input, but that are not included <br />on the list of Identified Projects and Processes, are provided in Section 10. <br /> <br />~5\^ISI <br /> <br />S.lal~.....ide WeIer Supply Initiclive <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ROWANNC\DESKTOP\SWSI\RICKREDREC_ENV WHITE PAPER_1 Q-4-QS.DOC <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.