My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SWSI Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities TRT Draft
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
SWSI Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities TRT Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:30:04 AM
Creation date
12/21/2007 2:11:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Technical Roundtable
Recreation & Environment
Title
SWSI - Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities White Paper
SWSI II - Doc Type
White Papers
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"In water law, Colorado has a reputation for doing things a bit differently than other <br />states - for instance its water court system requires the use of more lawyers and water engineers <br />than any other state. With instream flows, Colorado maintains its reputation, requiring very careful <br />scrutiny of water rights used to protect the environment. This approach creates additional costs <br />and hurdles for environmental water transactions, but results in rights that are well defined, secure <br />and defensible." 4 (page 52) <br /> <br />"Assuming that environmental rights are defended and enforced once established, rights <br />are more secure because of the Colorado water system. Unlike many western states, Colorado <br />water rights are essentially fully adjudicated. Information about water rights and use is easy to find <br />and rely upon compared to most states. It is comparatively easy to know about new appropriations <br />or changes to existing rights that may affect an instream right." 4 (page 56) <br /> <br />Another recently completed study comparing instream flow programs in western states found <br />that Colorado has "perfected more permanent water rights than any other [western] state; in fact, more <br />than most other [western] states combined." 5 Colorado has established instream flow rights on over 8,500 <br />miles of stream and 486 natural lakes in the state, and continues to provide instream flow protection to <br />approximately 40 new stream segments each year. <br /> <br />Instream Flow and Natural Lake Level Rights Provide Legal Protection for the Natural Environment <br /> <br />Balancing human needs with the needs of the environment can be a difficult task; providing legal <br />protection for environmental needs can be even more daunting. Rather than creating a "super" right, or mandating <br />bypass flows, Colorado's system of integrating instream flow and natural lake level water rights into the state's water <br />right allocation system places these water rights on an even plane with traditional, consumptive water uses. Instream <br />flow and natural lake rights are permanent, fully adjudicated water rights and are administered as any other water <br />right in the state, consistent with Colorado's Prior Appropriation Doctrine. <br /> <br />Instream flow and natural lake rights in Colorado provide legal protection for the natural environment by <br />awarding them status as permanent, fully adjudicated water rights. These rights protect flow through a reach of <br />stream, not just at a bypass point, and have legal standing in Water Court to protect against injury at any point within <br />that instream flow reach. <br /> <br />New Appropriations Preserve Existing Stream Conditions <br /> <br />Under state water law, adjudicated water rights are entitled to stream conditions as they existed at the time <br />of appropriation. Junior priority instream flow water rights cannot affect operation of any senior decreed water <br />rights. However, if a change of water right is sought for the senior water right, CWCB has standing in Water Court, <br />just as any other water right owner, to ensure stream conditions are not altered to the detriment of decreed instream <br />flow water rights. This fundamental premise forms the basis for CWCB to file Statements of Opposition to <br />potentially injurious change of water right applications, and to require protective terms and conditions in the <br />applicant's decree. The CWCB has successfully negotiated terms and conditions to insure its instream flow water <br />rights are protected in over 99% of the cases it enters; thereby allowing the water right change to proceed and the <br />stream to be protected. <br /> <br />Water Acquisitions Provide a Mechanism for Improving or Restoring Flows <br /> <br />5 "Decades Down the Road: An Analysis of Instream Flow Programs in Colorado and the Western United States, <br />prepared by Sasha Charney for the Colorado Water Conservation Board, July 2005. <br />http://www.cwcb.state.co.us/isf/Programs/WesternISF.htm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.