My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SWSI Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities TRT Draft
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
SWSI Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities TRT Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:30:04 AM
Creation date
12/21/2007 2:11:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Technical Roundtable
Recreation & Environment
Title
SWSI - Environment and Recreation Needs and Priorities White Paper
SWSI II - Doc Type
White Papers
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />water rights decrees filed by other water users and by monitoring stream flows and assisting <br />the State and Division Engineers in administering the prior appropriation system so that the <br />CWCB's instream flow water rights are not injured. <br /> <br />Additionally, the passage of Senate Bill 216 in 2001, which recognizes a new type of water right <br />- RICDs - has provided a legal avenue for establishing recreational options. <br /> <br />The presence of endangered fish in basins across the state, as described in Sections 3 and 6 of <br />the SWSI Report, influences current stream management in accordance with the ESA. Critical <br />habitat designations have been applied to many reaches in the state with corresponding flow <br />recommendations. While these recommendations are not legally binding, water users are <br />making good faith efforts to meet the recommendations. In this way, the ESA has provided for <br />the establishment of environmental options, albeit non- legally binding options. <br /> <br />In addition, interstate compacts and decrees and senior water rights serve to ensure that river <br />flows are maintained. For example, approximately 75 percent of the water in the Colorado River <br />and its tributaries must flow out of the state pursuant to the compact. <br /> <br />Possible Future Statewide Environmental and Recreational Options <br /> <br />Statewide environmental and recreational options are those that are not specific to a stream <br />reach or locality, and that could potentially be applicable in more than one part of the state. <br />Possible statewide environmental options discussed in the Basin Roundtable Technical <br />Meetings include: <br /> <br />. Sizing of new storage projects to include a dedicated "pool" for environmental instream flow <br />management <br /> <br />. Acquiring by purchase or lease existing water rights to maintain higher instream flows for <br />the environment <br /> <br />. Voluntary re-operation of existing projects to enhance environmental benefits without <br />impacting yield <br /> <br />. Releasing reservoir water in a pattern that generally follows "natural" flow conditions; e.g., <br />The Nature Conservancy paper (Richter 1997): <br /> <br />- Releasing periodic high flows <br /> <br />- Maintaining average monthly stream flows within :tl standard deviation of historical <br />average monthly flows <br /> <br />Possible statewide recreational options discussed in the Basin Roundtable Technical Meetings <br />include: <br /> <br />. New reservoir pool sizing to allow for recreational opportunities <br />. Developing minimum reservoir pool levels to maintain flatwater recreational appeal <br />. Voluntary flow management agreements <br /> <br />~5\^ISI <br /> <br />S.lal~.....ide WeIer Supply Initiclive <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ROWANNC\DESKTOP\SWSI\RICKREDREC_ENV WHITE PAPER_1 Q-4-QS.DOC <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.