Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 5 Summary of Suggestions for Determining Environmental and Recreational Needs <br /> <br /> Environmental I I <br /> and Recreational <br /> Demand <br />Suggested by Component <br />Trout Unlimited - . Flow requirements for . USACE, Metropolitan Denver Water Supply ES, 1988. <br /> sustaining physical stream <br /> habitat and impacts that could <br /> result from altered flow regimes <br /> in various Metro Denver rivers <br />Trout Unlimited - . 1-day and 30-day, and 3-year . Contact plant operators or Colorado Pollution Elimination <br /> low flows for stream reaches Discharge Permits for each discharger <br /> below wastewater treatment <br /> plant <br />Trout Unlimited - . Assessing instream flow needs . Various USFS EIS and Environmental Assessments - <br /> for streams on National Forest Ex: Arapahoe Basin Master Development Plan Final EIS, <br /> System Lands Prepared by the White River national Forest, Dillon <br /> Ranger District, September 1999 <br /> <br />1 Covington, J. Scott, and Wayne A. Hubert (2003). Trout Population Responses to Restoration of Streamflows. Environmental Management, <br />31 (1), 135-147. <br /> <br />5. Environmental and Recreational Options <br /> <br />Colorado's current and future environmental and recreational water needs bring a unique set of <br />issues to water management. As highlighted in Section 6.1.3 of the SWSI Report, a number of <br />new and innovative approaches to meeting environmental and recreational needs and moving <br />from mitigation to enhancement were discussed through the course of SWSI and the Basin <br />Roundtable Technical Meetings. However, to date, there is no single agreed upon approach or <br />set of criteria, other than the CWCB instream flow program, for prioritizing stream reaches for <br />environmental and recreational enhancement or setting associated flow goals. <br /> <br />Section 6 of the SWSI Report also provided background on existing flow goals and key <br />programs geared toward meeting environmental and recreational flows on major rivers and <br />tributaries in each basin. Many of the identified flow goals do not have an associated Identified <br />Project or Process to meet the goals, though some Identified Projects and Processes meet <br />multiple goals that can include environmental and recreational benefits. <br /> <br />Looking ahead, SWSI sought to further identify approaches and possible new projects or <br />management strategies - many of which are stand-alone, many of which could potentially be <br />integrated into multi-beneficiary projects - that could be used to address environmental and <br />recreational water needs. In this section, the key concepts guiding the development of future <br />environmental and recreational "options" are discussed along with some potential statewide <br />approaches to environmental and recreational flow enhancement. Section 10.3 of the SWSI <br />Report presents a basin-by-basin discussion of specific M&I, agricultural, and environmental <br />and recreational options that could be used to meet future needs. <br /> <br />~5\^ISI <br /> <br />S.lal~.....ide WeIer Supply Initiclive <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ROWANNC\DESKTOP\SWSI\RICKREDREC_ENV WHITE PAPER_1 Q-4-QS.DOC <br /> <br />11 <br />