My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AltAgTranTRT1Summaryfinal
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
AltAgTranTRT1Summaryfinal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:28:56 AM
Creation date
12/21/2007 11:53:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Technical Roundtable
Agricultural Transfer
Title
Meeting Summary
Date
9/26/2005
SWSI II - Doc Type
Summaries
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Alternative Agricultural Transfers Technical Roundtable Meeting #1 <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br />7. Is there potential for seasonal fallowing? (Should be amended to cover suitable lands in <br />"vicinity" of recreational and environmental needs.) <br /> <br />Blue <br />3 <br /> <br />Red <br /> <br />Yellow <br /> <br />Green <br />4 <br /> <br />Orange <br />2 <br /> <br />8. Should different alternatives be focused for different uses? (e.g., interruptible supplies for <br />drought year and fallowing for base supplies). <br />What are key elements of interruptible or rotating transfers plans that are needed to <br />ensure reliable supply to the M&I or other user? This reliable supply needs to be <br />permanent. <br /> <br />Blue <br />2 <br /> <br />Red <br /> <br />Yellow <br /> <br />Green <br /> <br />Orange <br />1 <br /> <br />Institutional and Political Questions <br />1. What are the required institutional mechanisms and arrangements? <br /> <br />Blue <br /> <br />Red <br /> <br />Yellow <br />1 <br /> <br />Green <br />1 <br /> <br />Orange <br /> <br />2. Should the programs be administered by the end user, governmental agency, or by the <br />8 agricultural water rights owners or ditch and reservoir companies? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Blue <br />1 <br /> <br />Red <br />4 <br /> <br />Yellow <br />4 <br /> <br />Green <br />13 <br /> <br />Orange <br />2 <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Can the program(s) be successful if the agricultural user is not required to bind the land <br />and water to irrigation? <br /> <br />G) <br /> <br />3a. What is the required permanency or certainty that a water supplier must require on <br />an agreement for land fallowing? <br /> <br />Blue <br />1 <br /> <br />Red <br />2 <br /> <br />Yellow <br />2 <br /> <br />Green <br />8 <br /> <br />Orange <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />What program conditions are needed to ensure that private property rights are not <br />impaired? <br /> <br />G) <br /> <br />4a. How can we help without taking away from the value to the property and water <br />right owner allowing the free market to operate? <br /> <br />Blue <br /> <br />Red <br />4 <br /> <br />Yellow <br />1 <br /> <br />Green <br />16 <br /> <br />Orange <br />2 <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />S:\SWSI 2\Meetings\Technical Roundtable\TRT Meeting - Specific\Alternative Ag Transfers\summary\Alt Ag Tran TRT #1 Summary final.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.