Laserfiche WebLink
really need... Want to know competition for these numbers. h7 the north area, this CBT is <br />the only option; interest is therefore what is the demand number; need best quantitative <br />numbers you can supply. <br />Gerke: If we are going to proceed with water development, we need how far we are off. <br />Ament: Troubled by Nebraska drilling 300 high capacity wells; therefore, need <br />groundwater data; are we tightening up our system so that NE is not sucking up our <br />water? <br />Dick S: We cannot export; as long as compact is not being met, cannot export <br />Ament: Are we utilizing the groundwater or are we letting that groundwater go into NE? <br />Does Julesburg have opportunity to ameliorate their wells? <br />Fred Walker: To speak to point of quantification, in my presentation to IBCC, I asked for <br />more money for our needs assessment...we need to give input as per needs assessment. <br />Lets break for supper. <br />Dinner <br />Hecox: Additional feedback on presentation; points that Dick went through; need <br />quantitative numbers; complexities and difficulties come to the fore; thus, proposal: keep <br />quantitative analysis at a general level, can do that and put together work plans for Upper <br />Mtn Counties and Republican River Needs; this would be the basis, then turn into needs <br />assessment plan; would like to put together a small conuluttee that we can work with to <br />make sure we are making the correct assumptions; small time commitment... conference <br />call Input? <br />Janet Bell: Will you have a separate group for the mountain needs? <br />Hecox: Yes, we would continue to work on these six items then put together a different <br />group to work on work plan for Upper Mtn counties and then another one for the <br />Republican Basin. Product would be a teclulical memo on quantitative and qualitative <br />analysis; the deliverable on the Upper Mtn and Republican will be a work plan, then <br />another entity would have to go forward for the actual study. <br />Harold Evans: The impact of the reusable water was not quantified in SWSI I; when look <br />at competition for water supplies, will you really come up with anything else than what is <br />in SWSI Phase I? As a state, our focus needs to be on how we solve the gap. <br />Hecox: We will probably get a bit more info but not drastically different; new info will <br />come from reusable water quantity; those pieces will further characterize the gap, but as <br />far as changing the magnitude, the qualitative analysis gives the big picture, and the <br />solutions will not change much. <br />