My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25d (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
25d (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:47 PM
Creation date
12/4/2007 11:12:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-24- <br />Hendrick said the system could be a defense against drought for the state. <br />"The Denver Basin is like Fort Knox during the drought," Hendrick said. "Bring the water. We'll fill it <br />up " <br />,., ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN <br />FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT LITIGATION: The Lower Arkansas Valley Water <br />Conservancy District has filed a lawsuit against the US Bureau of Reclamation. The lawsuit contends <br />that Reclamation's 40-year contract with the City of Aurora allowing the City to store up to 10,000 acre- <br />feet of water in Pueblo Reservoir violates the National Environmental Policy Act, ignores Reclamation <br />policy, and that Reclamation had no authority to issue contracts to water users outside the Arkansas River <br />Basin using Fryingpan-Arkansas facilities. A large number of major water users in the Arkansas River <br />basin have been working on coordinated water development and operational plans for several years and <br />this lawsuit may result in significant setbacks to those efforts. <br />FOUNTAIN CREEK TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE UPDATE: The Fountain Creek <br />Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) continues to meet on a monthly basis to address technical issues <br />facing the watershed. This group is a parallel, but separate group, from the Fountain Creek Vision Task <br />Force, whose mission is to prepare a comprehensive strategic plan for the Fountain Creek Watershed, <br />which would incorporate and address all of the planning, scientific, and visioning documents, including <br />those prepared by the TAC. The TAC's primary concerns continue to center around flood risk reduction, <br />ecosystem restoration, and channel and streambank stability. The Corps of Engineers' Albuquerque <br />District, in partnership with the TAC, has entered the Project Formulation and Evaluation stage, in which <br />specific projects are identified and ranked according to a variety of factors. Currently 46 potential <br />projects in the three main areas of concern (flood reduction, ecosystem restoration, and stability) have <br />been identified with a goal of ranking these projects and identifying the top ten. The top ten projects will <br />likely move forward once funding is secured in an effort at providing solutions to the problems facing the <br />watershed in these three areas. Kevin Houck continues to represent the CWCB at the TAC meetings. <br />ARKANSAS VALLEY CONDUIT: The Conduit Committee continues to meet regularly and is <br />focusing on lobbying efforts to further legislation and appropriations, outreach efforts to participant <br />governing bodies, water allocation for the conduit, and grant applications. Recent outreach meetings to <br />touch base with and report on progress to 31 of the 41 participating entities went well. There has been no <br />movement on the "stand-alone bill" to authorize the Conduit with an 80/20 cost sharing agreement <br />between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local participants. The Bureau is currently considering a <br />SECWCD proposal to use revenues from excess-capacity storage leases (If and When Storage) in Pueblo <br />Reservoir, to pay off parts of the Fry-Ark project, including the Ark Valley Conduit. This may be holding <br />up progress on the "stand-alone bill" as lease revenue details are worked out. Also, on September 24, <br />2007 the Senate passed (81-12) the $23 billion Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) including <br />$79,000,000 for the Conduit through the Army Corps of Engineers. The bill was vetoed by President <br />Bush and is awaiting an override vote in the Senate. A State and Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG) <br />through the EPA has passed in the Senate with $600,000, but received no funding in the House. <br />Reconciliation on the funding is expected by December 2008. If this does not occur, the EPA could use <br />its discretion in a continuing resolution to fund the grant. This funding requires a 45% local match, and <br />at the March 2007 meeting, CWCB approved a SB-179 grant for $200,000 to be used for partial matching <br />funds. The grant funds will be used to continue planning and complete the preliminary engineering <br />studies and design. The State and SECWCD are currently negotiating terms for the grant contract. <br />ARKANSAS `'ALLEY DRAINAGE: A study, approximately 90% complete, assesses the potential for <br />drainage system rehabilitation projects and development of a plan for- improving subsurface drainage <br />Flood Protection • Water Project Planning and Finance • Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection • Conservation Plarming <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.