My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25b (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
25b (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:42 PM
Creation date
12/4/2007 11:07:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
IBCC Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lllembers of the Public <br />Diane Hoppe Pete Conovitz <br />Mary Lou Smith Don Ament <br />Phyllis Thomas Polly Hays <br />Rick Parsons Janet Bell <br />Jerry Pena Bill Jerke <br />Ben Harding Bob Streeter <br />Bruce Gerk Fred Walker <br />Welcome, Introductions and A6enda Review <br />Harris Sherman opened the meeting, and welcomed Representative Dan Gibbs, who will replace <br />Rep. Kathleen Curry as the representative of the House Agriculture, Livestock and Natural <br />Resources Committee. He and Eric Hecox reviewed the agenda with the group. <br />Colorado River Basin Activities and Issues <br />Rick Brown began with a review of changes made to the scope for the Colorado River Water <br />Availability Study, using the most recent Scope of Work. He reported that CWCB would like to <br />use the Colorado River Roundtable meeting on September 24~' to get comments from the west <br />slope Roundtables. <br />Changes to the scope since the previous meeting include: <br />Expedited schedule <br />Study now two phases, instead of three <br />Alternate hydrology and climate change to be considered in first phase <br />Reporting out added at end of first phase (to get agreement before phase 2) <br />T. Wright Dickinson: Is there any controversy around the documents you're including in the <br />literature review? As you move through, please consider how widely each document is <br />accepted. <br />RickBrown: I haven't heard any controversy. There may be additional resources people <br />want to add. <br />Eric Kuhn: The literature review helps someone reading the study understand that there is not <br />one answer, but a range based on best available research. To build acceptance of the <br />outcomes of the study, we need to be up front about the uncertainties. Reporting at the end <br />of the first phase could help maintain interest in the study. <br />T. TJ'right Dickinson: How will changes in the make up of our forests change the yield of <br />these basins'? Bugs and fires contribute to loss of leaf canopy that keeps snow off the ground, <br />and the change in vegetative makeup has both an immediate and long-term impact <br />Rick Brown: We want to consider how forest changes affect naturalized flow, both short term <br />and long term. The forest may return to baseline conditions over the long term. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.