My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
11 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
11/30/2007 11:41:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
ISF Section - Contested Instream flow Appropriation Hearing - Badger Creek
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Instiā¢eam Flow Recommendation(s) <br />BLM recommended an enlargement of 2.50 cfs during the summer, based on its August 23, 2005 and <br />August 14, 2004 data collection efforts (see Appendix). The modeling results from this survey effort are <br />within the confidence interval produced by the R2Cross model. <br />Land Status Review <br /> Total Length Land Ownership <br />U er Terminus Lower Terminus (miles) % Private % Public <br />Spring complex in <br />SE/4 SE/4, Section Confluence with 17.7 10% ° <br />90 /o <br /> Arkansas River <br />13, TS1N R10E <br />The 90% public land ownership is comprised of USFS (52%), BLM (26%), and State (12%). <br />Biological Data <br />The BLM has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a natural <br />environment that can be preserved. As reported in the letter from BLM to the CWCB "Badger Creek is a <br />moderate gradient stream with small substrate size that occasionally experiences very large flood events. <br />The stream supports riparian communities consisting of cottonwood/coyote willow, willow/alder, and <br />mesic grasses." Fishery surveys indicate that the stream environment is presently in stable condition, and <br />supports aself-sustaining brown trout fishery. Channel stability, bank stability, food supplies, and water <br />quality are good for salmonids. However, the fishery is limited by a high silt load and occasional high <br />stream temperatures. Accordingly, it is important to provide streamflows that keep stream temperatures <br />low and that flush sediments from the system." (See Fish Survey in Appendix B). <br />Field Survey Data <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve the natural <br />environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream discharge and channel <br />profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most easily visualized as the stream <br />habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. This type of hydraulic data collection consists <br />of setting up a transect, surveying the stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. The <br />appendix contains copies of field data collected for this proposed segment. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret output from the <br />R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow recommendation. This initial <br />recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic requirements of each stream without regard to <br />water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and <br />average velocity are used to develop biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined <br />that by maintaining these three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic <br />habitat in pools and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates <br />(Nehring 1979; Espegren 1996). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.