My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11 (2)
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
11 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
11/30/2007 11:41:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
ISF Section - Contested Instream flow Appropriation Hearing - Badger Creek
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Water Availability. BLM is awaze of only one decreed surface diversions in this reach, the <br />Taylor Ditch. However, the CWCB should confirm that this ditch is still in operation. BLM <br />recommends using USGS gage 07093775 (Badger Creek near Howard, CO) as an indication of <br />water availability, since this gage was operated near the downstream terminus of the proposed <br />reach. BLM does not recommend using USGS gage 07093740, because this gage is located <br />upstream from the proposed reach, and the readings do not include flows from the major spring <br />complex that feeds Badger Creek. The extremely stable water supply afforded by these springs is <br />evidenced by the abundance of watercress in the stream channel, which grows only in very stable <br />flow regimes. Finally, please note the previous instream flow appropriation completed in 1974 <br />appears to refer to this spring complex as the headwaters of the creek, but the headwaters of the <br />creek aze actually located more than ten miles upstream. <br />Relationship to Management Plans. BLM is interested in protecting flows on Badger Creek <br />because it is one of the few streams managed by BLM on the eastern side of the upper Arkansas <br />River Valley that is capable of supporting a salmonid fishery. It is cleaz that resident brown trout <br />in the Arkansas River move up into the creek for spawning purposes. Because the creek has <br />public access at several points, it has the potential to become a more heavily used recreational <br />fishery as stream conditions improve and fish populations expand. In addition, BLM has <br />participated in ongoing partnerships with land owners along the creek to improve upland, <br />riparian, and aquatic conditions. Stream conditions have improved markedly because of these <br />partnerships, but there are still some isolated locations where stream health conditions are poor. <br />The BLM requests that the Boazd recognize that this recommendation is based only upon the <br />minimum flows necessary to support cold-water fishery values. BLM may wish to work with the <br />Board and/or through the Colorado water rights system to appropriate flows to optimally protect <br />fish values and to protect other water-dependent values specified in BLM resource management <br />plans. <br />Data sheets, R2Cross output, fishery survey information, and photographs of the cross section are <br />enclosed to support this recommendation. We thank both the Division of Wildlife and the Water <br />Conservation Board for their cooperation in this effort. <br />If you have any questions regarding our instream flow recommendation, please contact Roy <br />Smith at 303-239-3940. <br />Sincerely, <br />' ,~ _--, <br />1 ~~ <br />J 1 <br />Linda M. Anaiiia <br />Deputy State Director <br />Resources and Fire <br />4 Enclosures <br />cc: David Gilbert, Royal Gorge FO <br />Roy Masinton, Royal Gorge FO <br />John Smeins, Royal Gorge FO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.