Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Figure 1--Estimated Stream Flow on ]Badger Creek <br />Badger Creek Dkscharge iadJusEsd Tv asistlng rights), Etdstlng ISF, 8 Proposed Enlarged (Total) ISFa <br />• <br /> <br /> 14 <br />00 <br /> . <br />+zoo <br /> to <br />ao <br />2 <br />e <br />B <br />c . <br /> <br /> <br />e <br />oo <br /> . <br />e <br />oo <br /> . <br />4 <br />00 <br /> . <br /> zoo <br /> oo <br />o <br /> . Jan Feb Nar Apr Wy Jun <br />Ypalr JW Atp Sao Oct Nov Dec <br />B.ae.r a urn wn+r Flew (.epmsa ar owav r4Nr1 <br />rsF <br />Aaorrd Nw pow] Vumrmu. ISF <br />P~apowC Nw 1*ew) raen ISF <br />Table 2 and Figure 1 show that the summer flow recommendation of 5.5 cfs (2.5 cfs enlazgement) is. <br />available at least 50% of the time during April 1 to August 31. Based on limited water availability, the <br />summer flow recommendation was further reduced to 5.0 cfs (2.0 cfs enlargement) from September 1 to <br />October 31. <br />Precipitation Data <br />Staff reviewed local precipitation data sets from two weather stations located in the proximity of the Badger <br />Creek drainage. Table 3 shows the water yeaz and the percent of average precipitation recorded at each site. <br />The average precipitation during the period of 1980 to 2003 is 89 percent of average at the Salida station <br />and 107 percent of average at the Gulley 10 SE station, indicating that the period of record for the gage is <br />reflective of average conditions. <br />Table 3: Precipitation Data as s percentage of Average <br />