My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
11 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
11/30/2007 11:41:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
ISF Section - Contested Instream flow Appropriation Hearing - Badger Creek
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR <br />BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT <br />COLORADO STATE OFFICE <br />2850 YOUNGFIELD STREET <br />LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215-7093 <br />In Reply Refer To: <br />7250 {CO-932) <br />'~T 3 ~ ; <br />Ms. Linda Bassi <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, Seventh Floor <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Ms. Bassi: <br />You have verbally requested a letter from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM} <br />further explaining its scientific rationale for proposing an enlargement of the instream <br />flow water right on Badger Creek, located in Water Division 2. The BLM's original <br />recommendation letter to the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) was sent in <br />December 2006, and the CWCB declared its intent to appropriate the recommended <br />enlargement at its January 2007 regular board meeting. This letter does not address the <br />scientific foundation behind the R2Cross methodology and the (CWCB) application of it, <br />because BLM believes that those discussions are best conducted between the Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife and the CWCB. Rather, this letter addresses the potential effects in <br />the stream of relying upon the current instream flow water right of 3 cfs year-round. <br />BLM was motivated to evaluate the current instream flow water right on Badger Creek <br />because of BLM's significant investments in this watershed during the last 20 years. <br />These investments have included: <br />• Purchase of almost 800 acres within the creek corridor to improve public access <br />and facilitate better range and riparian management; <br />• Installation of new fences and modification of grazing plans to improve riparian <br />conditions along the creek; <br />• Tamarisk control efforts; <br />• Motorized vehicle closures in high erosion areas; <br />• Studies to identify locations and control measures for landscape features that <br />produce high sediment loads to the creek and thereby reduce aquatic productivity; <br />• A partnership with USGS to install and operate a stream gage to verify flow and <br />water quality conditions in the watershed; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.