Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br /> <br />values on Plates Ib through IVb were reproducible. In all <br />instances, the original and reproduced values departed by less <br />than one percent. <br /> <br />Using the barrier elevation map (Figure 3.4, HMR 55A and <br />Appendix B of this study) for the region in and around the Cherry <br />Creek Drainage, the raster fields of non-orographic values were <br />next adjusted to sea level assuming a saturated, pseudo-adiabatic <br />atmosphere. Basin average values of 10-mi2 non-orographic PMP <br />for each duration adjusted to sea level were then obtained using <br />GRASS software. These average values are shown in Table 1. To <br />reiterate what has just been done at this stage: 13,568 values <br />(depths) of 10-mi2, among-storm PMP were made to be centered at <br />each of the 13,568 grid locations in the Cherry Creek Drainage, <br />at sea level for each of four durations. A smoothed depth- <br />duration curve (Figure 1) was drawn for these four values and <br />depths at 12 and 48 hours were obtained. Five of these 10-mi2 <br />values were then used in combination with the depth-area curves <br />of Figure 11.4 of HMR 55A (including depth-area curves, not <br />shown, interpolated for 12 and 48 hours) to obtain the values <br />shown in Table 2. Appendix B of this study contains Figure 11.4. <br />The Table 2 values were then read into a software program from <br />the BOSS Corporation referenced hereafter as PRHMR52 which <br />emulates the procedures of HMR 52. <br /> <br />PRHMR52 calculated labels for isohyets of within-storm <br />non-orographic PMP at sea level. For durations of 1-, 6-, 24-, <br />and 72-hours, raster fields were made starting from the PRHMR52 <br />derived isohyets using GRASS software. In contrast to what was <br />done earlier, the GRASS software at this stage has produced <br />13,568 point values of within-storm PMP at sea level in the <br />Cherry Creek Drainage. We assumed that there was no variation in <br />the point value of precipitation in the .03 mi2 (.19 times .15) <br />area represented by a grid point. This assumption is more likely <br />to be correct for the distribution of rain rates from a PMS in a <br />.03 mi2 area than for everyday rain rates across the same sized <br />area. The 13,568 point values at sea level were then "returned" <br />to the barrier elevation using the inverse of the procedure which <br />"brought" the among-storm non-orographic values to sea level. <br />The within-storm, non-orographic point values of PMP for each of <br />the four durations were then multiplied by corresponding <br />K-factors to create a raster field of complete or total PMP. <br /> <br />Isohyetal depictions of these values are presented at a <br />scale of approximately 1:250,000 in Figures 2-5. The complete or <br />total PMP raster field was smoothed to prepare Figures 2-5. The <br />next step was to obtain average values of within-storm, total PMP <br />for the Cherry Creek Drainage at the durations of 1, 6, 24, and <br />72 hours from the unsmoothed raster field of total PMP. These <br />values are shown in Table 3 and are plotted in Figure 6 as filled <br />circles and a smooth curve was drawn through them. Values were <br />extracted from this curve for each 6-hour duration and 6-hourly <br />