My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
10 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:33:53 PM
Creation date
11/30/2007 10:24:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
ISF Section - Uncontested 2007 Instream Flow Appropriations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 <br />• Moving through the channel the seasonally deposited sediment that can clog <br />salmonid spawning zones; <br />• Removing the algae that deposits on the stream bed and, over time, "cements" <br />sediment particles into place; <br />• Recharging alluvial aquifers that release water slowly during low flow periods; <br />• Maintaining riffle habitat by clearing collections of debris and bed material <br />deposits that effectively dam channels; <br />• Providing the cues to species that initiate spring spawning; <br />• Creating the disturbed areas necessary for riparian plant species germination to <br />maintain both age and species diversity. <br />The morphology of Pauline Creek would accentuate the effects of protecting a year-round <br />flow of 3.5 cfs. As a moderate to low gradient stream, Pauline Creek requires adequate <br />average velocities to suspend and transport sediment. Furthermore, 3.5 cfs does not <br />generally provide the velocity preferred by salmonids during the high growth summer <br />months. Pauline Creek is also limited in the amount of habitat suitable for spawning <br />because of the prevalence of pools in this system. Since spawning habitat is limited by <br />stream morphology, a further limitation due to a lack of the velocities preferred for <br />spawning will likely result in future declines in fish populations. BLM believes the <br />current diverse and productive fishery is the result of the current flow regime that is <br />consistently above the current 3.5 cfs instream flow water right. <br />Finally, the morphology of Pauline Creek has produced other biological characteristics <br />that would accentuate the effects of protecting ayear-round flow rate of 3.5 cfs. Pauline <br />Creek's abundant pools have resulted in much open water habitat and limited vegetative <br />cover. BLM is not concerned that increased stream temperatures due to solar radiation <br />will result in direct mortality to fish. Rather, BLM is concerned that, with inadequate <br />water exchange through those pools, water temperatures will likely rise and dissolved <br />oxygen will likely decline These changes in water temperature and oxygen saturation <br />could significantly change the composition of the aquatic macroinvertebrate community <br />which would be detrimental to salmonids. Maintaining a healthy salmonid community is <br />BLM's management objective for this creek. <br />Pauline Creek has become a significant wetlands asset in the Cochetopa Creek watershed <br />because of grazing management changes during the last 25 years. In many locations, <br />Pauline Creek contains wetlands and riparian vegetation across the entire valley floor. <br />These extensive wetland communities are the consequence of the high snowmelt runoff <br />that is captured and stored in groundwater and side channels. BLM would expect a <br />significant decrease in wetland acreage if flows were held to the 3.5 cfs rate year-round. <br />If Pauline Creek were maintained at the current year-round 3.5 cfs flow rate, the <br />functions listed above would be severely impaired. BLM recognizes CWCB instream <br />flow water rights are not designed to protect all of the peak flow, just the flows necessary <br />to protect the environment to a reasonable degree. This increase will allow this objective <br />to be achieved without excessively limiting the water available for appropriation. A 6.25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.