Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado River <br />During the early 1990s, the Board was involved with the USFWS to quantify and appropriate <br />recovery flows for endangered fish in the Colorado River. In 1992, the Board appropriated an instream <br />flow water right on the main stem of the Colorado River downstream from the GVIC diversion for 581 <br />cfs. After additional studies of return flows and flow accretions to the critical habitat reach of the <br />Colorado River, the Board subsequently appropriated an enlargement of flow for the lower 2 miles of the <br />decreed instream flow reach. The 1994 enlargement was for an additional 300 cfs to aid in the recovery <br />of endangered fish. <br />Cattle Creek <br />In 1997, the BLM presented a recommendation to the Board to enlarge the decreed instream flow <br />on Cattle Creek "during the high temperature period between April 1 and October 31." "This flow meets <br />all three instream flow criteria, and is driven by the average depth criteria." The basis cited by BLM for <br />this enlargement was `Tuture subdivision development in the area will result in increased demands for <br />water from this stream" and the recommendation was important to BLM resource management goals. <br />Minnie Gulch <br />In 2004, the BLM recommended this segment of stream for an enlargement. The basis cited by <br />BLM for this enlargement is "This recommendation is driven by the average depth criteria. BLM was <br />concerned that the existing 1 cfs instream flow water right did not provide sufficient physical habitat <br />during the warn summer weather, and the R2Cross surveys verified that concern." Also referenced in the <br />recommendation letter is the BLM's concern that it "is engaged in a multi-year, multi-million dollar effort <br />to reduce acid mine drainage from historic mines in the Animas drainage. The objective of this effort is <br />restoring ecological functioning to water quality degraded streams in the basin. Minnie Gulch drains an <br />area with very few mines, and it is one of the very few streams in the area that has sufficient water quality <br />to support a trout fishery. BLM is very interested in protecting flows in this system to maintain <br />ecological functioning. <br />San Miguel River <br />In 2005, the DOW recommended this segment of stream for an enlargement. In 1996, "the San <br />Miguel Stakeholders requested that DOW and CWCB revisit the upper San Miguel River Basin and <br />evaluate the flow needs of all stream segments located in the basin." Additional data was collected by <br />DOW which indicated the need to enlarge the existing decree by 4 cfs from May through October. "This <br />flow is required to maintain to a reasonable degree, the three principal hydraulic criteria of average depth, <br />average velocity and percent wetted perimeter." <br />Bear Creek <br />In 2005, the DOW recommended this segment of stream for an enlargement. In 1996, "the San <br />Miguel Stakeholders requested that DOW and CWCB revisit the upper San Miguel River Basin and <br />evaluate the flow needs of all stream segments located in the basin." Additional data was collected by <br />DOW which indicated the need to enlarge the existing decree by 4.5 cfs from May through October. <br />"This flow is required to maintain to a reasonable degree, the three principal hydraulic criteria of average <br />depth, average velocity and percent wetted perimeter." <br />