Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mapping Plan for Colorado <br /> <br />that the State Floodplain Mapping Coordinator will be able to fulfill these responsibilities cooperatively <br />with the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District. <br /> <br />1.3 Mapping Needs Assessment and Priority Setting Approach <br /> <br />To fully evaluate floodplain mapping needs in Colorado, the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />performed a mapping needs assessment in June, July and August 2002. This mapping needs assessment <br />included the following tasks: <br /> <br />. Soliciting mapping needs information from counties and communities; <br /> <br />. Reviewing available community-specific data; <br /> <br />. Reviewing the information in the FEMA Mapping Needs Update Support System (MNUSS); <br /> <br />. Assigning map upgrade methods and priorities to each county; and <br /> <br />. Assessing whether the proposed map update options would achieve the GPRA performance <br />measures and revise the map update methods accordingly. <br /> <br />The most significant effort in this mapping needs assessment was devoted to the gathering of data and <br />analysis of data to carry out the CWCB's mapping needs prioritization methodology. That methodology <br />is described in detail later in this report. A separate portion of this mapping needs assessment was <br />undertaken in cooperation with, and with the support of FEMA and FEMA's Flood Map Production <br />Coordination Contractor (MCC). The following data was collected and assessed on a county-by-county <br />basis: <br /> <br />. Age of the existing maps; <br />. Known mapping needs as recorded in the FEMA Mapping Needs Update Support System <br />(MNUSS); <br />. Status of existing maps (digital, manual, none); <br />. Existing or potential local mapping partners; <br />. Number of unmapped, floodprone communities; <br />. Number of communities; <br />. Availability of existing base map, topographic data, and/or flood hazard data (including data from <br />other State agencies); <br />. Number of Letters of Map Change processed during the last 10 years; <br />. Population and population growth (U.S. Census figures); <br />. Flood insurance claims and/or repetitive losses; <br />. Availability of State and/or local funding; <br />. Format of existing maps (countywide or community-based format); and <br />. Ongoing map updates, including updates being undertaken by regional agencies or communities <br />under the Cooperating Technical Partners (CTP) Program. <br /> <br />The CWCB believes that the results of its prioritization methodology provides appropriate guidance for <br />vest meeting Colorado's specific floodplain mapping needs. <br /> <br />A complete listing of the data collected for Colorado is provided in the Appendices. <br /> <br />12/26/2002 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 38 <br />