My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11043
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11043
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:19:33 AM
Creation date
11/29/2007 1:33:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Map Modernization Implementation Plan for Colorado
Date
8/1/2002
Prepared For
FEMA Region 8
Prepared By
CWCB, UDFCD
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mapping Plan for Colorado <br /> <br />9.0 Overall Colorado Recommendations <br /> <br />The CWCB believes that addressing all of the mapping needs identified in this plan will take at least 6 <br />years. The number of years it takes to meet Colorado's floodplain mapping needs will depend on the <br />following factors: <br /> <br />. The difference between the estimated costs of mapping contained in this report and the <br />actual costs; <br />. The policy decisions made about which stream reaches to map, which map panels to <br />update, and which stream reaches and map panels to leave alone within any given county <br />(how complete does the mapping for any county have to be); <br />. The policy decisions made about mapping every county in Colorado vs. mapping only <br />higher priority counties; and <br />. The policy decisions made about mapping floodplains for communities not participating <br />in the NPIP. <br /> <br />This report presents a complete picture of floodplain mapping needs in Colorado, assuming that all <br />identified needs would be addressed. The following overall recommendations are made with that <br />assumption in mind, while recognizing that some very important budgetary and policy questions are still <br />to be resolved. <br /> <br />CWCB staff has set a tentative goal of beginning to prepare PIS' for 10 counties out of the top 16 in the <br />first year of Map Modernization funding. The "top 16 counties" would all be equal candidates for first- <br />year work. The CWCB and the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District would select the 10 counties <br />out of that pool of potential candidates with the greatest likelihood of success, based on funding, GIS base <br />map and topographic map availability, staff commitment and similar factors. Those counties out of that <br />pool of 16 counties for which mapping was not started in the first year would become part of the pool of <br />16 candidates for the second year and so on. <br /> <br />With that kind of management strategy in mind, the overall recommendations presented below are <br />divided into four groups of 16 counties. This does not mean that the CWCB proposes a four-year <br />program. In fact we believe it will take longer than four years to meet Colorado's mapping needs. <br />Instead, the recommendations provided below simply provide four distinct pools of candidate counties, <br />ranging from the highest priority counties to the lowest priority counties, as measured by the CWCB <br />methodology. <br /> <br />9.1 First Priority Counties <br /> <br />The 16 "first priority" counties are those counties that received the highest scores from the CWCB <br />prioritization methodology. Some characteristics that many of these counties share in common are: <br /> <br />. Large population <br />. Rapid growth <br />. A history of severe floods <br />. Impacts to watersheds due to the wildfires of 2002 <br /> <br />The CWCB is confident that from this pool of 16 counties, a group of 10 counties can be selected that <br />will provide Colorado with a good first-year start to Map Modernization. First priority counties are listed <br />in Table 9.1 and shown in Top Ranked Counties, Figure 10. <br /> <br />12/26/2002 <br /> <br />Page 29 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.