My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11043
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11043
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:19:33 AM
Creation date
11/29/2007 1:33:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Map Modernization Implementation Plan for Colorado
Date
8/1/2002
Prepared For
FEMA Region 8
Prepared By
CWCB, UDFCD
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mapping Plan for Colorado <br /> <br />for the fire affected counties. The CWCB has taken note of eleven of the 64 counties in Colorado where <br />fires have severely affected watersheds. This is such a serious matter in the eyes of the CWCB that those <br />counties have been assigned points in the scoring methodology. Counties with fire impacts in 2002 <br />received scores of 5, while those with no fire impacts received scores of O. Six of the fire-impacted <br />counties are in the "top 16 counties" list, in part as a result of this parameter. Figure 8 shows Colorado <br />Counties impacted by significant fires in 2002. <br /> <br />Figure 8 <br /> <br />Wildfire Impacted Counties <br /> <br />Wildfire Impact <br />DO <br />_3 <br /> <br /> <br />Sedgwick <br /> <br />Moffat <br /> <br />Weld <br /> <br />Logan <br /> <br />Phillips <br /> <br />Morgan <br /> <br />Yuma <br /> <br />Washington <br /> <br />Kit Carson <br /> <br />Elbert <br /> <br />Cheyenne <br /> <br />Kiowa <br /> <br />Prowers <br /> <br />Baca <br /> <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />100 Miles <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.-t, <br /> <br />f;.M1~l1t~~ <br /> <br />Note: The above scores are weighted. Weighting of individual parameters is explained below. <br /> <br />6.8 Assigning Weights to Individual Parameters <br /> <br />For all seven parameters scores of 0 to 5 or of 1 to 5 were assigned to each county. CWCB staff <br />determined that the parameters were not all of equal importance. It was decided that no parameter should <br />have a weight greater than 2.0 or a weight less than 0.5. Three parameters, population, CWCB rating of <br />likelihood of success, and population growth, were deemed from the beginning to be more important that <br />any other parameters. Two parameters, unmapped status and wildfire impacts, were deemed to be less <br />important than any other parameters. That left two parameters in the middle of the weighting scale. <br />Those two parameters are CWCB risk rating and age of maps. <br /> <br />12/26/2002 <br /> <br />Page 25 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.