My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10401
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:32 AM
Creation date
11/5/2007 3:58:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
El Paso
Community
Colorado Springs
Stream Name
Fountain Creek
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Fountain Creek Drainage Basin Planning Study - Volume 1
Date
7/1/1994
Prepared For
Colorado Springs
Prepared By
Muller Engineering Company, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A second expression is the following equation modified from the original equation <br />initially proposed by Hathway: <br /> <br />Te = ((2Ln)/(3*S^0.5))^0.47 <br /> <br />Where:Tc = Time of concentration (minutes) <br />L = Channel length (feet) <br />S = Mean slope of the basin <br />n = Manning's roughness coefficient <br /> <br />Final Te values were determined by adding travel times for the various conveyance <br />elements to the initial overland flow time. <br /> <br />Six major detention structures have been included in the hydrologic model. These <br />structures are North and South Catamount Reservoirs, Crystal Creek Reservoir, <br />Manitou Reservoir, lake Moraine, and Big Tooth Reservoir. Smaller detention <br />structures were not considered in the hydrologic analysis because the effects of <br />such structures would not be seen on the mainstream of Fountain Creek. These <br />facilities do not have a dedicated flood control function and as such provide <br />only incidental alteration of flood flow release. <br /> <br />Routing of flow in the hydrologic model was accomplished using the Muskingum- <br />Cunge method. Th is rout i ng techn i que is a new method of hydrograph rout i ng <br />available within HEC-l version 4.0. Parameters used in this method for each <br />individual reach or sub-basin include the length, slope, Manning's roughness <br />coefficient, type of channel, bottom width of the channel, and channel side <br />slope. <br /> <br />Within the HEC-l computer program, rainfall is input and runoff is calculated for <br />each individual sub-basin. Definition of rainfall and runoff information is <br />described in more detail in following sections of this report. This runoff is <br />either combined with runoff from another basin, routed through a reach, or routed <br />through a detention structure, to establish discharges at various points <br />throughout the Fountain Creek basin. Combination points are denoteq by "DP" and <br />a numerical value (i .e., DP27) within the HEC-1 input data. Where DP is a <br />abbreviation for design point and the numerical value is a location identifier. <br /> <br />Channel and reservoir routing is denoted by "RT" and a numerical value (i.e., RT <br />131). Similar to the combination points, the RT is an abbreviation for routing <br />of flow and the numerical value is a location identifier. At all design points <br />a minimum of two and a maximum of five hydrographs were combined to determine the <br />outflow hydrograph at that specific point. Design point peak flows for the <br />Fountain Creek mainstream are presented in Tables 4.7-4 and 4.7-5. Design point <br />hYdrographs for select locations along Fountain Creek are presented in Figures <br />4.7-1, 4.7-2 and 4.7-3 for existing and future conditions. <br /> <br />4.0-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.