Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />TIlE COlORAdo DRouGln MiTiGATioN ANd RESpONSE PIAN <br /> <br />The agricultural business suffered severely during the <br />drought of the 1930s, The situation was exacerbated <br />by poor farming techniques, low market prices, and a <br />depressed economy which caused many to migrate <br />away from farming. At the same time, progress was <br />made toward improving the situation: better agricultural <br />management; establishment of insurance programs; <br />liberalization of credit; and diversification of the regional <br />economy, Other improvements included irrigation; the <br />planting of trees for wind breaks to mitigate soil erosion; <br />and air conditioned tractors to keep dust from the <br />operator. These adjustments moderated the drought in <br />the early 1950s, Impacts were much less severe, <br />although climatological conditions were not that <br />different from those of the dust bowl era. <br /> <br />The drought of 1976-77 was essentially a winter event <br />and was not long in duration, However, it was the driest <br />winter in recorded history for much of Colorado's high <br />country and western slope, and had serious conse- <br />quences for the ski industry, Another drought that <br />began in the fall of 1980 and lasted until the summer of <br />1981 also generated costly impacts on the ski industry <br />and initiated a huge investment in snow making <br />equipment (Mckee, Doesken, and Kleist, 1999), This <br />was the last severe and widespread drought to affect <br />Colorado, <br /> <br />Since 1981, Colorado has seen a sustained overall wet <br />period, A few localized exceptions include a significant, <br />but brief drought in southwest Colorado from 1989 to <br />1990; a growing season drought in 1994 in northeast <br />Colorado; and a localized drought in southwest Colorado <br />from late 1995 into 1996. La Nina influenced weather <br />patterns in the winter of 1999, leaving the statewide <br />snowpack abnormally low in the spring. While many parts <br />of the country were experiencing drought conditions, <br />abundant moisture in the second half of 1999 resulted in <br />wet conditions over almost all of Colorado (Colorado State <br />University, Colorado Climate Center, 1999), <br /> <br />Conclusions From Past Drought Efforts <br /> <br />In the 1976-77 drought, Colorado's government <br />assumed a lead role in coordinating federal, state, and <br />local government response, and promoted statewide <br />public conservation practices, Conclusions from that <br />effort include: <br /> <br />. the diversity, complexity, and ambiguity of drought <br />impacts blurred identification of alternative actions <br />available to decision makers; <br /> <br />. a systematic definition of problem areas and <br />potential solutions was essential to effective <br />government response, so "under" and "over" <br />reactions could be minimized; <br /> <br />PAGE 6 <br /> <br />. both physical and social impact data were needed; <br /> <br />· knowledge of the location, kind, and degree of water <br />shortage provides better identification of impacts; <br /> <br />. timely and accurate data on impact development <br />was crucial to effective response; <br /> <br />· impact identification provides the framework for <br />governmental and public adjustments; <br /> <br />· integration of response by private, public, and <br />governmental entities was needed; <br /> <br />. as the drought intensifies, the maintenance of <br />established channels of responsibility, with <br />emphasis on water conservation and planning, <br />becomes increasingly important; <br /> <br />. as impact problems and local needs become more <br />serious, better management and integration of effort <br />also intensifies; and <br /> <br />· should drought intensify to the point where impacts <br />exceed the state's response capabilities, an <br />effective state program will help facilitate a request <br />for federal assistance. <br /> <br />Reference Appendix B for additional impacts, actions, <br />and lessons learned from previous droughts, <br /> <br />Drought Planning Begins... <br /> <br />Governor Lamm took action in February 1981 to deal <br />with potential drought situations. His memorandum of <br />February 5 required the accomplishment of the <br />following tasks: <br /> <br />(1). Develop and activate a data collection and <br />assessment system which will identify the potential <br />impacts of a drought and track their occurrence <br />and intensity. At some point, this assessment <br />process may result in a recommendation that a <br />drought emergency be proclaimed. <br /> <br />(2). Develop a drought emergency response plan <br />which would be activated by a drought emergency <br />decision, This task includes cataloguing existing <br />state and federal response and relief programs <br />and authorities, and developing recommendations <br />to meet additional needs, <br /> <br />The initial Colorado Drought Response Plan was <br />completed in 1981, and revised in 1986, 1990, and 2001. <br />In 1981, it was one of three state drought plans in the <br />nation. Since that time, the plan has been widely <br />distributed and received interest both nationally and <br />internationally. It has served as a model for other states. <br /> <br />JANUARY 2001 <br /> <br />