<br />..
<br />
<br />TIlE COlORAdo DRouGln MiTiGATioN ANd RESpONSE PIAN
<br />
<br />The agricultural business suffered severely during the
<br />drought of the 1930s, The situation was exacerbated
<br />by poor farming techniques, low market prices, and a
<br />depressed economy which caused many to migrate
<br />away from farming. At the same time, progress was
<br />made toward improving the situation: better agricultural
<br />management; establishment of insurance programs;
<br />liberalization of credit; and diversification of the regional
<br />economy, Other improvements included irrigation; the
<br />planting of trees for wind breaks to mitigate soil erosion;
<br />and air conditioned tractors to keep dust from the
<br />operator. These adjustments moderated the drought in
<br />the early 1950s, Impacts were much less severe,
<br />although climatological conditions were not that
<br />different from those of the dust bowl era.
<br />
<br />The drought of 1976-77 was essentially a winter event
<br />and was not long in duration, However, it was the driest
<br />winter in recorded history for much of Colorado's high
<br />country and western slope, and had serious conse-
<br />quences for the ski industry, Another drought that
<br />began in the fall of 1980 and lasted until the summer of
<br />1981 also generated costly impacts on the ski industry
<br />and initiated a huge investment in snow making
<br />equipment (Mckee, Doesken, and Kleist, 1999), This
<br />was the last severe and widespread drought to affect
<br />Colorado,
<br />
<br />Since 1981, Colorado has seen a sustained overall wet
<br />period, A few localized exceptions include a significant,
<br />but brief drought in southwest Colorado from 1989 to
<br />1990; a growing season drought in 1994 in northeast
<br />Colorado; and a localized drought in southwest Colorado
<br />from late 1995 into 1996. La Nina influenced weather
<br />patterns in the winter of 1999, leaving the statewide
<br />snowpack abnormally low in the spring. While many parts
<br />of the country were experiencing drought conditions,
<br />abundant moisture in the second half of 1999 resulted in
<br />wet conditions over almost all of Colorado (Colorado State
<br />University, Colorado Climate Center, 1999),
<br />
<br />Conclusions From Past Drought Efforts
<br />
<br />In the 1976-77 drought, Colorado's government
<br />assumed a lead role in coordinating federal, state, and
<br />local government response, and promoted statewide
<br />public conservation practices, Conclusions from that
<br />effort include:
<br />
<br />. the diversity, complexity, and ambiguity of drought
<br />impacts blurred identification of alternative actions
<br />available to decision makers;
<br />
<br />. a systematic definition of problem areas and
<br />potential solutions was essential to effective
<br />government response, so "under" and "over"
<br />reactions could be minimized;
<br />
<br />PAGE 6
<br />
<br />. both physical and social impact data were needed;
<br />
<br />· knowledge of the location, kind, and degree of water
<br />shortage provides better identification of impacts;
<br />
<br />. timely and accurate data on impact development
<br />was crucial to effective response;
<br />
<br />· impact identification provides the framework for
<br />governmental and public adjustments;
<br />
<br />· integration of response by private, public, and
<br />governmental entities was needed;
<br />
<br />. as the drought intensifies, the maintenance of
<br />established channels of responsibility, with
<br />emphasis on water conservation and planning,
<br />becomes increasingly important;
<br />
<br />. as impact problems and local needs become more
<br />serious, better management and integration of effort
<br />also intensifies; and
<br />
<br />· should drought intensify to the point where impacts
<br />exceed the state's response capabilities, an
<br />effective state program will help facilitate a request
<br />for federal assistance.
<br />
<br />Reference Appendix B for additional impacts, actions,
<br />and lessons learned from previous droughts,
<br />
<br />Drought Planning Begins...
<br />
<br />Governor Lamm took action in February 1981 to deal
<br />with potential drought situations. His memorandum of
<br />February 5 required the accomplishment of the
<br />following tasks:
<br />
<br />(1). Develop and activate a data collection and
<br />assessment system which will identify the potential
<br />impacts of a drought and track their occurrence
<br />and intensity. At some point, this assessment
<br />process may result in a recommendation that a
<br />drought emergency be proclaimed.
<br />
<br />(2). Develop a drought emergency response plan
<br />which would be activated by a drought emergency
<br />decision, This task includes cataloguing existing
<br />state and federal response and relief programs
<br />and authorities, and developing recommendations
<br />to meet additional needs,
<br />
<br />The initial Colorado Drought Response Plan was
<br />completed in 1981, and revised in 1986, 1990, and 2001.
<br />In 1981, it was one of three state drought plans in the
<br />nation. Since that time, the plan has been widely
<br />distributed and received interest both nationally and
<br />internationally. It has served as a model for other states.
<br />
<br />JANUARY 2001
<br />
<br />
|