Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III- 3 <br /> <br />A peak discharge of I, 730 cfs and tp at Eldorado Springs of four <br />hours were developed. The reasonableness of these figures was checked <br />utilizing other hydrologic tools such as flood frequency analysis of flows <br />on South Boulder Creek, comparison with historic flow data at stream <br />gages in the region, and evaluation of parameters used to develop the flows <br />on Boulder Creek by the Corps of Engineers. Similar results were <br />obtained with these more approximate methods. <br /> <br />The Commons dimensionless hydrograph(l)was used with the peak <br />flow of 1,730 ds and the runoff pattern to develop the hydrograph at <br />Eldorado Springs re sulting from the 100-year storm. <br /> <br />This same procedure was used to develop hydrographs at two <br />additional points downstream to determine the variation in peak flows <br />and hydrograph slopes as the flood moves down the stream channels. <br />The other points chosen to determine the extent of this variation were at <br />the Boulder Turnpike and the confluence with Boulder Creek. <br /> <br />The flatter slopes downstream of Eldorado Springs necessitated <br />a modification to the unit hydrograph which would reflect the reduced <br />peaks and increased travel time. This modification was accomplished <br />by us ing a procedure developed by the Soil Conservation Service which <br />modified the parameters used in establishing the shape of the hydrograph. <br />The peak flows resulting from storms of various return intervals at <br />various locations along South Boulder Creek are shown in Table 2 on <br />the following page. The I OO-year flood flows, shown on Table 2, compare with <br />the Corps of Engineers study which determined the Intermediate Regional Flood <br />for present conditions, equivalent to the 100-year flood, to be 5,000 cfs at both <br />Eldorado Springs and the confluence with Boulder Creek. <br /> <br />The flows for Marshall and Viele Gulches were developed using <br />the CUHP method. Since they are relatively small drainage basins that <br />may become urbanized in the future, they have hydrographs with high peaks <br />of short duration. Since these peaks will occur much earlier than the peak <br />in South Boulder Creek, their combined effect is less than the sum of their <br />peaks. <br /> <br />It should be noted that the above-mentioned hydrographs assumed <br />that there will be no flow into South Boulder Creek from Bear Creek. <br />During a major storm, a portion of the flows from Bear Creek presently <br />enter the South Boulder Creek basin by way of the Empson Ditch. For <br />purposes of this study, it was assumed that the City will be able to follow <br />previous recommendations by others to insure that this water will flow <br /> <br />(I) G. G. Commons, Flood Hydrographs, Civil Engineering, Volume 12, <br />p. 571, 1942. <br /> <br />