Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JUN-08-88 10,28 FROM,ALBUQUERQUE OISTRICT-EOC. <br />'JUN-03-99 09:30 FROM:DIU 2 DWI~ 719-544'0800 <br /> <br />10,5053423488 <br />TO:~S3123499 <br /> <br />PAGE 3/10 <br />P~E:002/00,=, <br /> <br />. , <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />S&:eve Wiae <br /> <br />nOM: <br /> <br />Frank Kipplc <br />November f2, 1997 <br /> <br />DATE; <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />ArJcan$ll$ Riyer at La Juara, ColoRdo <br /> <br />ClIANGES IN ARKANSAS RIVER CHA.NNEL. 19(;3 -1997 <br /> <br />TIIis is in response co a request ro look ill Acbnsas Rive. ~el changes anbe La JUllta saSWg s&itico <br />and. higbway &ridge. nlC period includes Ibe 1965 flood; and the bcgiMint of storage at Pueblo ~oit, <br /> <br />"[be fim table (Table No. 1) ofth~s memo shows the gage height of the poinr of zero flow tor seven oCthe <br />ratings trom 1963 to the presem. The poim of 2Zro tl.ow was obtained for 7 ratings (Nos. 30 _ 32. 34 _ 37) <br />from citherthe raling DJbJes or r:aI~ ~Ne ~D_ It also tndiclWS the ~hangc In the point af ~ t10w <br />compared to that Oft Ocb)ber I. I 96~. The flood or l~S lowtl'ltd tb~ point of zero nearly a halffoor. but it <br />has raised a couple of feet s~ th.ar. time, <br /> <br />Table No, 2 compares gage heights of tbe seven ~ tables for S sefec~ discharges ranging froD12D as <br />to 10,000 cfs_ The dam for 20 cfs. bas trends simiJar to ~ for the poillt of 2t{o flow, The channel <br />scoured in 1965 dleu gradllaUyaggraded from 1965 to pRSCnt. The cb.anncl is:"bout 1 ~ fOOL higber thaD <br />i12 J 963. At Cbe high end of the rariDg$. tile gage height was about 5 f= higher in 1991. compared to 1963 <br />for ) 0.000 cfs. The earlier ~. 30 -~2. 34. aDd 35 did not show D'lU1::h c:haage at their upper mds. This <br />c:oo.ld have bca1 C8u$e([ by an insufficient t1umber of discharge measu.l"ema11s to define the h.igh end of <br />sorne mings, The 1965 flood probably changed. the ~ ~-discbllCge retaIioa.s&ip, rather tfjllJl just the <br />lower end. <br /> <br />TABLE NO. I <br />Point of Zero Flow (PZF) Comparison fqr Sdected ~tiag Tables <br /> <br />Ibtiag Table No. 1 <br /> <br />Period Covered by <br />Rafilag <br />10.1~3 tCl9-30-64 <br />10-1-64 to 14-65 <br />6-14-6 to9-3~ <br />11.1 1to ~3o-71 <br />10-1-71109-30-80 <br />10-1-80 to 2-28-91 <br />3- - I 1.0 present <br /> <br />roiut of Zt:I"Q Flow (P' <br />(pge datura) <br /> <br />ill feet Ch3~ of PZ,(l' from Ratint 1130 <br />(in feet) <br /> <br />3(J <br />31 <br />:32 <br />34 <br />3S <br /> <br />3.30 <br />3.50 <br />3.00 <br />2,88 <br />3.28 <br />4_06 <br />4.75 <br /> <br />0_00 <br />+.20 <br />-.30 <br />-.42 <br />-,02 <br />+.16 <br />+L45 <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />Ratmg Period Co.ered Di5eb.argc =20 Disdiarge - 80 DisehaFCe - Dixhargc_ Disebargc: - <br />Table by Rating cfs. ds. SOD cfs, 2000 as 10,000 efs <br />No. Gage 4 Gage .do Cage ^ Gage ll. Gage .do <br /> Height 2h Heigfllt gll Height 311. Heigbt gJ& Height gh <br />30 ] 0-.1-'63 [l) 9-30-64 3.61 0 4.QO 0 4.83 0 6.14 0 8.86 0 <br />31 10-1-64 to 6-14-65 ),81 +.20 4.10 +.10 4_8I!f -,03 6.14 0 8,86 0 <br />32 6-14-6S to 9-30.65 3.26 -,35 3.65 -.35 4.67 -,16 6.14 0 8.86 0 <br />34 11-1-6110 9-30-11 3:27 3.92 ' . 1,86 0 <br />-,34 -,08- S.02 "".19 6.23 +.09 <br />3~ 10.:1-71 to~30-80 4.08 +_47 4.46 +.46 5.32 +.99 .6.46 +.32 &.96 +.10 <br />36 I O-I-8D to 2-2g..9 ( 4.52 1'31 4,14 +.84- 5,80 -1-.97 7,08 +-94 9_71 +.85 <br />37 3-1-1991 to~ $.04 1.43 5,4,2 + 1.42 6..5& + I. 75 8.61 +2.47 13,8 -+4.94- <br /> ' -. <br /> <br />TABLE NO. 2 <br />Comparison of Gage 8eigilts for Difrerbt~gs at Severa! Disebzrg;es <br />