Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The regression equation for 25-yr peak flow for watersheds in Kansas is (USGS, 1987; 1993), <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Q25 (cfs) = 4.43 (A) Y (h) 3.339 S0.310 ( SprO.l56 <br />x = 0.864 (ArO.04 <br /> <br />The standard error of this equation is 29%. This results in a 25-year peak flow of 5,930 cfs with <br />a range of 4,210 to 7,650 cfs for Frenchman Creek at Holoyoke. <br /> <br />(v) Regression Equation for Plains Region of Eastern Colorado <br /> <br />The regression equation for plains region of eastern Colorado is as follows (USGS, 1993; <br />CWCB,1976): <br /> <br />QIOO (cfs) = 1770 (A)0.463 SO,086 <br /> <br />The standard error of this equation is -24 to + 32 %. This gives a value ofQlOo (cfs) = 28,257 cfs <br />with a range of 21,475 to 37,299 cfs, Regression equation for Q25 for watersheds in the plains <br />region of eastern Colorado is not available, <br /> <br />4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Estimated peak flows of Frenchman Creek at Holoyoke using different model parameters and <br />methods are shown in Table 8, <br /> <br />The estimates of peak flows included in the previous study (US ACE, 1980) are "based on <br />statistical analyses of the streamflow records of several drainage basins in the same geographical <br />region as the North Fork Republican River basin", The number of years of data, range of <br />drainage areas, and watershed characteristics for the streams included in these statistical analyses <br />are not known. Extrapolation based on these estimates results in a 100-yr peak flow of 8,940 cfs <br />at Holoyoke. Between the time of this study (July 1980) and the present (June 2001), higher <br />peak flows may have occurred due to urbanization in the sub-watersheds and randomly occurring <br />storm events some of which may have been more severe than those experienced prior to 1980, <br />As shown in Figure 1, the estimated values shown in Table 7 almost exactly fit a lognormal <br />distribution. Usually, the actual data would have some scatter above and below the fitted straight <br />line. So, there must have been a standard error of estimate associated with these estimated <br />values, These arguments suggest that the estimate of 8,940 cfs may not be sufficiently <br />conservative for current conditions. <br /> <br />The regression equations for southwest Nebraska (Region 2) result in a 100-yr peak flow ranging <br />from about 1,039 to 11,943 cfs (with an average of 6,491 cfs) and a 25-yr peak flow ranging <br />from 540 to 6,217 cfs (with an average of 3,379 cfs). These equations have a relatively high <br />standard error of 60% to 84%, Therefore, the estimates based on these equations are deemed to <br />have a relatively low accuracy. <br /> <br />Draft Letter Report <br />Independent Review of Hydrologic Analysis for Frenchman Creek <br />Contract No. DACW41-00-D-0026-0001 <br /> <br />Flood Plain Management Services Special Study <br />Holyoke, Colorado <br />June 18,200 I <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />