Laserfiche WebLink
<br />stormwater <br /> <br />Consider National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and <br />quality issues in overall basin planning. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />meetings, <br /> <br />invited to project <br /> <br />following organizations were notified of the project, <br />received meeting !1linutes <br /> <br />storage policy. <br /> <br />Consider a detention and channel <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Alternative Development Process <br /> <br />The development of alternatives was based on the inventory of existing channel and <br />riparian resources, the hydrologic analysis, and the goals and objectives of the study. <br />CH2M HILL initiated alternative development by preparing draft alternative concepts <br />presenting the concepts to the project sponsors and other interested organizations at <br />project meetings. During the project meetings, the pros and cons of alternatives were <br />discussed and alternative concepts were developed which met the needs and objectives <br />the project sponsors and the other organizations involved. <br /> <br />1.8 <br /> <br />Colorado WaterConservatiori Board <br />Federal Emergency Management Agency <br />Colorado State Land Board <br />Central Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />Colorado Department of Transportation <br />Henrylyn Irrigation District <br />North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association <br />Soil Conservation Service <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />Colorado Water Quality Control Division <br />U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Of these, staff from the first six organizations attended project meetings and provided <br />input during the hydrologic and alternative evaluation phase of the study. <br /> <br />Acknowledgments <br /> <br />CH2M HILL would like to acknowledge the following people who regularly contributed <br />to an understanding of the study area and to the progress of the hydrologic and alternative <br />evaluation portions of the study. <br /> <br />Person <br /> <br />Organization <br /> <br />1.7 Study Goals and Objectives <br /> <br />Ben Urbonas <br />John Doerfer <br /> <br />Kevin Wegener <br />Joe Wingert <br />Ronald Degenhart <br />Mike Turner <br /> <br />Brian Love <br /> <br />UDFCD <br /> <br />City of Aurora <br /> <br />Identify stream corridor width and physical design character that would <br />provide for adequate flood conveyance and establish stream corridors as a <br />major open space amenity for developing communities. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Daren Duncan <br />Besharah Najjar <br /> <br />Brian Hyde <br /> <br />John Liou <br /> <br />Scott Price <br /> <br />Forest Leaf <br />Gary Johnson <br />Butch Gerkin <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Federal Emergency Management Agency <br />Colorado State Land Board <br />Central Colorado Water_Conservancy District <br />Colorado Department of Transportation <br />Henrylyn Irrigation District <br /> <br />Arapahoe County <br />Adams County <br /> <br />Preserve and enhance, where possible, existing natural riparian areas and <br />functions. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />reducing <br /> <br />to establish stable channeling beds and banks, <br />and enhancing water quality. <br /> <br />Identify measures <br />long-term maintenance costs <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1.9 <br /> <br />1994 to <br /> <br />and September 21, <br /> <br />Twelve project meetings were held between October 26, 1993 <br />discuss results and solicit input from the advisory committee. <br /> <br />were adopted by the advisory committee. <br /> <br />Analyze existing and future development hydrology for the study area to <br />provide a basis for developing outfall systems plan. <br /> <br />The following study goals and objectives <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />and active and passive recreational facilities <br /> <br />access routes, <br />network. <br /> <br />Integrate trails, <br />into the stream <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />landowners and <br /> <br />system plan for <br /> <br />Estimate implementation costs of outfall <br />local jurisdictions. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1-3 <br /> <br />Prepare Flood Hazard Area Delineation (FHAD) floodplain and floodway <br />information for Coyote Run and Box Elder Creek within the study area. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />DENlOO16A53.WP5 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />