My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10390
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:22 AM
Creation date
10/25/2007 5:33:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder
Stream Name
Fourmile Canyon
Basin
South Platte
Title
Fourmile Canyon Creek - Major Drainageway Planning - Phase A Report - Alternatives Analysis
Date
6/1/2000
Prepared For
UDFCD, Boulder
Prepared By
Love & Associates
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />More Flood <br /> <br />Less Structural 1m <br /> <br />lain <br /> <br />All development within the existing floodplain should be in accordance with the City, County and <br />Federal permitting requirements. In additional we recommend that any development immediately <br />adjacent to Fourmile Canyon Creek be required to dedicate drainage easements, construct the <br />recommended flood improvements along the length of their property or put money in escrow for <br />future construction of the flood improvements as a condition of the development. <br /> <br />ment within the Flood <br /> <br />Develo <br /> <br />rovements <br /> <br />The independent review committee suggested a fourth alternative be considered which would consist <br />of less structural improvements and greater emphasis on floodplain management approaches, such as <br />improved maintenance, early warning systems, emergency response plans, flood proofing and <br />expanded flood insurance for those properties within the floodplain. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />rovements <br /> <br />Regardless of the floodplain mitigation alternative effort chosen, management of the Fourmile <br />Canyon Creek floodplain is likely to be an ongoing expense. Funding mechanisms should be planned <br />and implemented to fund floodplain improvements and, in the event of a damaging flood, fund the <br />emergency response, cleanup and repair of damages <br /> <br /> <br />Fundin <br /> <br />Fan <br /> <br />Fourmile Canyon Creek, in the area east of the mouth of the canyon, is perched atop an alluvial fan. <br />During the public review process, concern was expressed that due to the nature of an alluvial fan, a <br />major flood event could radically change the course and flow direction of the Fourmile Canyon Creek <br />channel. Concern was also expressed that the 'fixed bed" methodology used to define the existing <br />floodplain was inappropriate. <br /> <br />Alluvial <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />land Avenue <br /> <br />One possible alternative identified and discussed during the planning process was the elimination of <br />the Upland Avenue roadway crossing of Fourmile Canyon Creek. Elimination of this roadway <br />crossing of the creek would eliminate the cost of a bridge or culvert and would improve the flood <br />conveyance of the creek in the vicinity of Crestview Elementary School. Discussions identified two <br />scenarios for Upland Avenue. One, Upland Avenue would terminate in a cul-de-sac west of the creek <br />and secondly, Upland Avenue could be re-routed south to connect with Sumac Avenue or Tamarack <br />Avenue as part of the development ofa park site immediately west of Crestview Elementary. <br /> <br /> <br />Eliminatin <br /> <br />The Independent Review Committee investigated this concern and stated, in their review comments <br />dated May 2, 2000, that in their opinion most of the alluvial fan is currently inactive, Fourmile <br />Canyon Creek has a defined channel, a mappable floodplain and the "fixed bed" methodology <br />utilized to define the existing floodplain is appropriate. If a catastrophic flood should occur that <br />results in a change in the course of Fourmile Canyon Creek, the City will have to respond according <br />to the specifics ofthe flood event. The IRP report and recommendations can be found in Appendix E <br />of this report <br /> <br />FUTURE PLANNING AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />8.13 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Below is a list of additional items that should be taken into consideration during future planning, <br />design and implementation of flood mitigation improvements along Fourmile Canyon Creek. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />the environmental <br /> <br />with <br /> <br />accordance <br /> <br />In <br /> <br />Concerns <br /> <br />Flood improvements should be design and implemented <br />recommendations and guidelines presented in Chapter 7. <br /> <br />Environmental <br /> <br />Maintenance <br /> <br />lssues, <br /> <br />groundwater <br /> <br />address <br /> <br />Any planned <br />including: <br />. Potential impacts on the existing groundwater. <br />. Potential impacts on existing wells, <br />. Potential impacts to the existing contaminated groundwater plume <br />. Potential opportunities for ground water recharge <br /> <br />specifically <br /> <br />should <br /> <br />improvements <br /> <br />mitigation <br /> <br />flood <br /> <br />Plan, fund and implement a maintenance program that will monitor the Fourmile Canyon Creek <br />corridor, make spot repairs, repair erosion, and conduct weed control and removal of debris and <br />sediment as necessary. Over the years, lack of maintenance has allowed an extensive sediment <br />deposition and woody debris to minimize channel capacity. Regular maintenance will be a key in all <br />situations. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Miscellaneous recommendations <br /> <br />Ditch crossings should be designed to not accept or convey flood flows <br /> <br />rovements <br /> <br />Due to economic constraints phased implementation of flood improveme likely. In general <br />flood improvements should start in the downstream reaches first and proceed upstream. <br />Upstream improvements may be implemented prior to downstream improvements if no adverse <br />impact to downstream properties will occur. <br /> <br />nts is <br />then <br /> <br />of Flood 1m <br /> <br />Phasin <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />8-21 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.