Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />7.3 <br /> <br />Historic broad floodplain & diverse hydrologic regime <br />compressed. Riparian breadth & diversity limited. <br />Flood conveyance limited. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The principal environmental goals related to this master plan are to <br /> <br />Maximize the opportunity to re-establish long-term health and function of the stream corridor <br />in conjunction with flood improvements <br />Minimize impacts to healthy plant communities, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Among <br /> <br />and water quality <br /> <br />was published <br /> <br />Woody riparian species native to this area "do not regenerate in their own understory <br />and depend upon periodic disturbances to create suitable germination sites"... "In the <br />absence of major natural disturbances or human intervention, the reduction in cover by <br />native tree species is inevitable...catastrophic flooding or active management will be <br />necessary to increase native tree cover" (Gershman, 1999). <br /> <br />Frequent flood terrace & <br />regeneration of native <br />trees/shrubs lacking or limited. <br /> <br />In the Fourmile Canyon Creek corridor, due to the lack of a frequent flood terrace, the opportunity for <br />flooding to regenerate native vegetation is very limited. Spill of major flood events to the <br />Wonderland Creek tributary further reduces the effectiveness of a large flood event to affect <br />regeneration of native vegetation. Re-establishing a functional channel morphology and substantial <br />flood conveyance would restore a medium for native species regeneration and planting. <br /> <br /> <br />channelized & confmed. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />wildlife habitats, <br /> <br />In 1999, a riparian habitat assessment report of the City of Boulder tributaries <br />the conclusions for the City's tributaries overall was the following: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Excavation of a flood channel would afford the opportunity to enhance the stream ecosystem and <br />restore many ecological functions and values now lost. Specifically, restoring the integrity of the <br />channel restores the capability of the vegetation and habitat to regenerate. Re-establishment of a <br />defined and diverse active channel and frequent flood terrace is emphasized. The broader the <br />excavation, the broader the riparian terrace established, and the better the opportunity to create a <br />highly functional and valuable habitat. Where proposed improvements include excavation of the <br />channel invert in a broader flood channel, opportunities to re-establish some stream meanders and <br />aquatic diversity are increased. Yet channel excavation requires that existing vegetation be removed. <br />The two principle environmental goals identified are, therefore, somewhat contradictory. The greater <br />the long-term benefit of the design, the greater are the short-term impacts, and vice-versa. <br />Nevertheless, both goals are appropriate, and the balance between the two must be carefully <br />considered in the preliminary and final design processes <br /> <br />~ Aquatic habitat structure & <br />diversity lacking. <br /> <br /> <br />Frequent flood terrace & regeneration d.l <br />of native trees/shrubs lacking or limited \ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Conditions <br /> <br />Figure 7-2 <br />Existing Channel <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />7-7 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />