|
<br />
<br />The annual means for dissolved and suspended potas-
<br />sium were very similar. No prescribed water use criteria
<br />could be found specifically for potassium; no signifi-
<br />cant accumulation of potassium in the pool sediments
<br />could be'inferred from the data in table 4.
<br />
<br />Lithium. - Lithium is potentially toxic to plants [17].
<br />For this reason a limit of 2.5 mg/I was suggested by the
<br />U,S, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
<br />(now the Environmental Protection Agency) in 1968.
<br />Durum and Haffty [8] show a median concentration
<br />of dissolved lithium of 0.0011 mg/I in the rivers of
<br />North America, while Durfor and Becker [7] reported
<br />0.002 mg/I lithium, The mean value for lithium in the
<br />Arkansas River and Pueblo Reservoir was consistently
<br />higher than these values, averaging 0.017 :t 0,004 mg/I
<br />and 0.014 :t 0,004 mg/I in the pool for the two sam-
<br />pling years of the project, and 0.015 :t 0.007 mg/I and
<br />0.013 :t 0.008 mg/I at the inlet. The lithium in the sus-
<br />pended fraction was nearly negligible at 0.0007 :t 0.003
<br />mg/I and 0,0006 :t 0,002 mg/I, respectively, for the
<br />pool. The trends observed for lithium follow the trend
<br />observed for sodium very closely (figs. 12 and 20), The
<br />surface trend for lithium follows the sodium curve (fig.
<br />20) very closely, although the concentration of lithium
<br />is about 1000 times less. In April 1975, a decreasing
<br />surface trend was observed for sodium and lithium,
<br />with sodium concentrations almost exactly 1000 times
<br />greater than lithium at all sampling sites, Seasonal
<br />trends and depth profiles for lithium also parallel so-
<br />dium quite closely,
<br />
<br />Copper. - It has been suggested by Garrels and Christ
<br />[18] that cupric oxide or hydroxy-carbonate minerals
<br />would tend to limit the solubility of copper in aerated
<br />water to about 0,064 mg/I at a pH of 7.0, decreasing
<br />to 0,006 mg/I at a pH of 8.0, Hem [3] notes, however,
<br />that higher values have been observed, Dissolved copper
<br />levels for Pueblo Reservoir averaged 0.004 :t 0.001 mg/I
<br />during the 1974-75 sampling year and 0.004 :t 0.002
<br />mg/I during the 1975-76 sampling year, The highest
<br />average for the pool was 0.001 :t 0.005 mg/I (December
<br />1975), and the lowest averaged less than detectable
<br />limits on three separate sampling dates. The dissolved
<br />levels observed are completely consistent with predic-
<br />tions of Garrels and Christ [18], considering the pre-
<br />valent pH's of about eight, Hem [3] also notes that
<br />copper is essential to the nutrition of plants and ani-
<br />mals. However, no mechanism for copper removal be-
<br />sides inorganic precipitation is necessary to explain the
<br />observed levels.
<br />
<br />The suspended levels of copper were comparable to the
<br />dissolved levels. The reservoir pool average for the 1974-
<br />75 sampling year was 0.004 :t 0.001 mg/I and 0.006 :t
<br />
<br />0.003 mg/lduring the 1974-7 sampling year. The high-
<br />est pool average for a single month was 0.015 :t 0,007
<br />mg/I (December 1975). N ndetectable low averages
<br />were recorded for five mont Iy sampling periods.
<br />
<br />A seasonal trend with a ma imum value occurring dur-
<br />ing the early winter months as observed for dissolved
<br />copper. Comparison of the pool trend to the river at
<br />the inlet and outlet reveals similar trend. Figure 24
<br />drawn from the pre-impoun menfdata in appendix C
<br />also indicates a seasonal tre d. The average dissolved
<br />copper level at the two sites monitored during the pre-
<br />impoundment study was 0008 :t 0.005 mg/I (some-
<br />what higher than the avera e for the reservoir poon,
<br />while the average copper val es obtained at the inlet of
<br />the reservoir were consisten with the reservoir pool,
<br />0,004 :t 0.003 mg/I and 0, 04:t 0.005 mg/I for each
<br />year, respectively. No defin te surface or spatial trend
<br />was observed for copper.
<br />
<br />Kopp and Kroner [9] dete ed copper in 74 percent of
<br />the dissolved samples and 2 percent of the suspended
<br />samples collected from the s rface waters of the United
<br />States, Means of 0,015 mg/ (dissolved) and 0.26 mg/I
<br />(suspended) were recorded rom the samples in which
<br />copper was detected.
<br />
<br />Copper in the sediments av raged 31 :t 17 mg/I in the
<br />pre-impoundment flood pi in and only slightly higher
<br />at 37:t 13 mg/I in the sampl s collected in the reservoir.
<br />At site F near the inlet, ho ever, sedJments yielded 59
<br />mg/I copper, indicating so e copper loading into the
<br />sediments may be occurring near the inlet,
<br />
<br />Zinc. - Solubility controls do not tend to limit the
<br />concentrations of zinc obs ved in natural water, but
<br />rather the availability of zin from rock and soil [3] or
<br />from pollution sources. A s' nificant source of zinc in
<br />the Arkansas River is from the mine drainages in the
<br />Leadville area, particularl California Gulch [19],
<br />Durum, et al. [10] reported zinc in a range of 0,010 to
<br />0.050 mg/I in most samples obtained from surface wa-
<br />ters, but occasionally valu s exceeding 5.0 mg/I, the
<br />recommended upper ,limit f r drinking water, were ob-
<br />served. In this study a mean f 0.010:t 0.015 mg/I zinc
<br />was observed the first sa pling year (1974-75) and
<br />0,007 :t 0.002 mg/I during he second (1975-76). The
<br />low average occurred in Ma ch 1975, at 0.001 :t 0,002
<br />mg/1. The high average was ,038:t 0.122 mg/I in April
<br />1975. That average include several extreme values cb-
<br />tained from samples taken t the bottom of the reser-
<br />voir, including a value of O. 68 mg/I obtained at site A
<br />bottom at a depth of 15 me res,
<br />
<br />26
<br />
|