Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The annual means for dissolved and suspended potas- <br />sium were very similar. No prescribed water use criteria <br />could be found specifically for potassium; no signifi- <br />cant accumulation of potassium in the pool sediments <br />could be'inferred from the data in table 4. <br /> <br />Lithium. - Lithium is potentially toxic to plants [17]. <br />For this reason a limit of 2.5 mg/I was suggested by the <br />U,S, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration <br />(now the Environmental Protection Agency) in 1968. <br />Durum and Haffty [8] show a median concentration <br />of dissolved lithium of 0.0011 mg/I in the rivers of <br />North America, while Durfor and Becker [7] reported <br />0.002 mg/I lithium, The mean value for lithium in the <br />Arkansas River and Pueblo Reservoir was consistently <br />higher than these values, averaging 0.017 :t 0,004 mg/I <br />and 0.014 :t 0,004 mg/I in the pool for the two sam- <br />pling years of the project, and 0.015 :t 0.007 mg/I and <br />0.013 :t 0.008 mg/I at the inlet. The lithium in the sus- <br />pended fraction was nearly negligible at 0.0007 :t 0.003 <br />mg/I and 0,0006 :t 0,002 mg/I, respectively, for the <br />pool. The trends observed for lithium follow the trend <br />observed for sodium very closely (figs. 12 and 20), The <br />surface trend for lithium follows the sodium curve (fig. <br />20) very closely, although the concentration of lithium <br />is about 1000 times less. In April 1975, a decreasing <br />surface trend was observed for sodium and lithium, <br />with sodium concentrations almost exactly 1000 times <br />greater than lithium at all sampling sites, Seasonal <br />trends and depth profiles for lithium also parallel so- <br />dium quite closely, <br /> <br />Copper. - It has been suggested by Garrels and Christ <br />[18] that cupric oxide or hydroxy-carbonate minerals <br />would tend to limit the solubility of copper in aerated <br />water to about 0,064 mg/I at a pH of 7.0, decreasing <br />to 0,006 mg/I at a pH of 8.0, Hem [3] notes, however, <br />that higher values have been observed, Dissolved copper <br />levels for Pueblo Reservoir averaged 0.004 :t 0.001 mg/I <br />during the 1974-75 sampling year and 0.004 :t 0.002 <br />mg/I during the 1975-76 sampling year, The highest <br />average for the pool was 0.001 :t 0.005 mg/I (December <br />1975), and the lowest averaged less than detectable <br />limits on three separate sampling dates. The dissolved <br />levels observed are completely consistent with predic- <br />tions of Garrels and Christ [18], considering the pre- <br />valent pH's of about eight, Hem [3] also notes that <br />copper is essential to the nutrition of plants and ani- <br />mals. However, no mechanism for copper removal be- <br />sides inorganic precipitation is necessary to explain the <br />observed levels. <br /> <br />The suspended levels of copper were comparable to the <br />dissolved levels. The reservoir pool average for the 1974- <br />75 sampling year was 0.004 :t 0.001 mg/I and 0.006 :t <br /> <br />0.003 mg/lduring the 1974-7 sampling year. The high- <br />est pool average for a single month was 0.015 :t 0,007 <br />mg/I (December 1975). N ndetectable low averages <br />were recorded for five mont Iy sampling periods. <br /> <br />A seasonal trend with a ma imum value occurring dur- <br />ing the early winter months as observed for dissolved <br />copper. Comparison of the pool trend to the river at <br />the inlet and outlet reveals similar trend. Figure 24 <br />drawn from the pre-impoun menfdata in appendix C <br />also indicates a seasonal tre d. The average dissolved <br />copper level at the two sites monitored during the pre- <br />impoundment study was 0008 :t 0.005 mg/I (some- <br />what higher than the avera e for the reservoir poon, <br />while the average copper val es obtained at the inlet of <br />the reservoir were consisten with the reservoir pool, <br />0,004 :t 0.003 mg/I and 0, 04:t 0.005 mg/I for each <br />year, respectively. No defin te surface or spatial trend <br />was observed for copper. <br /> <br />Kopp and Kroner [9] dete ed copper in 74 percent of <br />the dissolved samples and 2 percent of the suspended <br />samples collected from the s rface waters of the United <br />States, Means of 0,015 mg/ (dissolved) and 0.26 mg/I <br />(suspended) were recorded rom the samples in which <br />copper was detected. <br /> <br />Copper in the sediments av raged 31 :t 17 mg/I in the <br />pre-impoundment flood pi in and only slightly higher <br />at 37:t 13 mg/I in the sampl s collected in the reservoir. <br />At site F near the inlet, ho ever, sedJments yielded 59 <br />mg/I copper, indicating so e copper loading into the <br />sediments may be occurring near the inlet, <br /> <br />Zinc. - Solubility controls do not tend to limit the <br />concentrations of zinc obs ved in natural water, but <br />rather the availability of zin from rock and soil [3] or <br />from pollution sources. A s' nificant source of zinc in <br />the Arkansas River is from the mine drainages in the <br />Leadville area, particularl California Gulch [19], <br />Durum, et al. [10] reported zinc in a range of 0,010 to <br />0.050 mg/I in most samples obtained from surface wa- <br />ters, but occasionally valu s exceeding 5.0 mg/I, the <br />recommended upper ,limit f r drinking water, were ob- <br />served. In this study a mean f 0.010:t 0.015 mg/I zinc <br />was observed the first sa pling year (1974-75) and <br />0,007 :t 0.002 mg/I during he second (1975-76). The <br />low average occurred in Ma ch 1975, at 0.001 :t 0,002 <br />mg/1. The high average was ,038:t 0.122 mg/I in April <br />1975. That average include several extreme values cb- <br />tained from samples taken t the bottom of the reser- <br />voir, including a value of O. 68 mg/I obtained at site A <br />bottom at a depth of 15 me res, <br /> <br />26 <br />