Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-.-Cu <br />-.--1In <br />/IF -.- h <br />- ..- Zn <br /> <br />" . <br />DATE <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />,j F .. A <br />"'4 <br /> <br /> <br />C_.II_, 'e. Z_ <br /> <br />SEASONAL TRENDS ARKANSAS RIVER 1972 - 1174 <br /> <br />\ I <br />,~ <br />/ \ <br />\ / \ ~ <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />.os <br /> <br /> <br />~ .04 <br />.! <br /> <br />B <br />~AI <br />I <br />B <br />.. <br /> <br /> <br />.Cl2 <br /> <br />.00 <br /> <br />5 0 <br />IIT2 <br /> <br />J <br />..., <br /> <br />M . M <br />COLLECTIO_ <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />Figure 24.-Seasonal trends of dissolved copper, manganese, iron, and zinc in Arkansas <br />River, 1972-74. <br /> <br />the month of December 1975, there was an increase in <br />concentration toward the center of the reservoir from <br />both ends. During the same sampling period, similar <br />trends were observed for total hardness, zinc, lead, and <br />nickel concentrations, while the dissolved concentra- <br />tions of sulfate, potassium, and mercury decreased to- <br />ward the center. Manganese and iron increased toward <br />the inlet during November 1974, while just about <br />everything else decreased. <br /> <br />These observed trends would seem to arise from a <br />number of mechanisms involving several variables, in- <br />cluding: <br /> <br />1. The concentrative effect of evaporation from the <br />reservoir pool. <br /> <br />2. The varying quality of the water entering the <br />reservoir due to seasonal or source effects coupled <br />with a buffering effect of the reservoir. <br /> <br />3. The prevailing weather conditions (those at the <br />time of sampling and effects of recent runoffs <br />from local rain or snow). <br /> <br />The first effect mentioned would always have a tend- <br />ency to concentrate the dissolved solids, which would <br /> <br />predict decreasing concentrations moving toward the <br />inlet of the reservoir, which is the most commonly ob- <br />served trend. <br /> <br />The second effect is one in which water of higher or <br />lower concentration in dissolved solids is feeding the <br />reservoir. Water of lower concentration of ions feeds <br />the reservoir in the spring and early summer, creating a <br />dilution effect which would result in a decreasing con- <br />centration trend moving toward the inlet. However, <br />water feeding the pool in winter will normally contain <br />higher concentrations of dissolved ions, which will tend <br />to create an increasing concentration gradient moving <br />toward the inlet. Diverted water will have a similar <br />effect, depending on its quality. <br /> <br />The third effect is that of prevailing weather conditions. <br />Runoff from local rain will tend to feed the reservoir <br />with water containing relatively low concentrations of <br />various dissolved ions; whereas, runoff from snow, be- <br />cause it is slower, will have a higher dissolved ion con- <br />centration. <br /> <br />An inverse effect wou Id be expected for the suspended <br />loads being carried into the reservoir, i.e., rain, high; <br />snow, low. The phenomena such as observed in calcium <br />hardness curves (fig. 18) and other ion concentrations <br /> <br />21 <br />