My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10381
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10381
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:20 AM
Creation date
10/25/2007 4:07:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Pueblo
Stream Name
Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Effects of Impoundment on Water and Sediment in the Arkansas River at Pueblo Reservoir
Date
5/1/1977
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />tables 1 and 2 for the dissolved and suspended fractions <br />of the samples. The faf right-hand column of each <br />table in appendices A and B is the average and standard <br />deviation for each parameter for the sampling year that <br />appears in the table. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The tables in appendices A and B were produced from <br />computer printouts of the data. Because a consistent <br />format was needed to computerize the data, the values <br />listed do not in all cases reflect the proper number of <br />significant figures. Tables 1 and 2 also summarize where <br />the uncertainty appears and also give the approximate <br />magnitude of that uncertainty for each parameter. <br /> <br />Table4 (sediment data) was not generated by computer <br />and in all cases the proper uncertainty is reflected in <br />the number of significant figures displayed. All data in <br />table 4 are in units of mg/g (milligrams per gram) dry <br />weight. The values for parameters marked with aster- <br />isks were obtained by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Seasonal Trends (Dissolved Fraction) <br /> <br />Figures 4 through 16 plot the values obtained for dis- <br />solved parameters at the inlet and outlet of the reser- <br />voir as well as the average value obtained for all sam- <br />ples collected in the reservoir pool as a function of <br />time. The most frequent seasonal trend observed is that <br />of maxima occurring during the winter months when <br />runoff is low, and minima occurring in the summer <br />months when the runoff is high, thereby producing a <br />maximum dilution effect. <br /> <br />During the summer it was noted that the inlet values <br />for most parameters were lower than for the outlet <br />or pool. The inlet values rose rapidly during the fall, <br />becoming higher than the pool average and outlet dur- <br />ing the winter and early spring months. This behavior <br />indicates that the reservoir is acting as a buffer zone, <br />somewhat leveling the normal seasonal trends observed <br />for the river. <br /> <br />AI <br /> <br />Obvious exceptions to the general trends described <br />above are the seasonal trends observed for temperature <br />and turbidity. The minimum for temperatures obvi- <br />ously occurs in midwinter and the maximum in mid- <br />summer. Turbidity maxima occur in late spring during <br />the highest runoff periods and are at a minimum during <br />the midwinter months. The anomalous trends of iron <br />(fig. 161. zinc (fig. 141. and manganese (fig. 15) are <br />discussed in those sections. Many of the trace metals <br />were at levels below or very near detectable limits of <br />measurement, making the observation of trends diffi- <br />cult and in many cases impossible. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Figure 23 plots the seasonal trends observed for hard- <br />ness, alkalinity, and sulfate in the Arkansas River (1972- <br />1974) before formation of the reservoir. The same gen- <br />eral trends were observed for the pre-impoundment <br />river as for the reservoir (1974-76) with an important <br />subtle difference. In the pre-impoundment river, max- <br />ima were obtained for those parameters during Decem- <br />ber, followed by a gradual decrease in concentration to <br />a minimum in June or July. In the reservoir a drop in <br />concentration was not observed until April or May of <br />the first year and was still high during the last sampling <br />during March 1976. These data would also seem to <br />indicate, as in the case of the evidence cited before, <br />that the reservoir is acting as a buffer to the seasonal <br />trends. However, it should be noted that during the <br />two impoundment sampling years, the inlet values for <br />these and other parameters also remained high until <br />April or May, somewhat negating the buffering argu- <br />ment based solely on the pre-, post-impoundment com- <br />parison. Other arguments, however, tend to reinforce <br />the buffering mechanism. <br /> <br />Surface and Spatial Trends (Dissolved Fraction) <br /> <br />Figures 17 and 18 are spatial plots of the average of <br />the temperature and calcium hardness at the various <br />sites moving from the outlet west to the inlet for the <br />months of March, July, and December for both sam- <br />pling years. Figures 19 through 21 plot the values ob- <br />tained at the surface versus site moving east to west for <br />selected parameters for the month of November 1974. <br />During July, the average reservoir temperature generally <br />declined moving toward the inlet, while during March <br />of each year the average temperature rose (fig. 18). In <br />the month of December the temperature fell moving <br />toward the outlet in 1974 and rose during 1975. Simi- <br />lar trends were observed for calcium hardness. During <br />July of both years, there was a slight decrease in cal- <br />cium hardness concentration moving toward the inlet <br />as there was for March 1975, I n March 1976, the reser- <br />voir pool was about constant with regard to calcium <br />hardness, while slightly higher at the inlet and outlet. <br />During December 1974, calcium hardness was about <br />constant over all sites, while in December 1975, a cur- <br />ious crown shaped curve was obtained with the lowest <br />values at the inlet and outlet and rising to a maximum <br />at the center of the reservoir. Trends observed for <br />samples collected at the surface (figs. 19 and 20) show <br />a slight decrease in the values moving east to west for all <br />the parameters listed except manganese, which showed <br />a sharp increase going east to west. An examination of <br />the data indicates that during most of the months of <br />sampling, slight increases or decreases in values do occur <br />for most parameters moving east to west over the res- <br />ervoir. In some cases there is a definite increase or de- <br />crease at and near the inlet (site F) of the reservoir. In <br />some cases (as in the case of calcium hardness) during <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.