Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A.3.1.7 <br /> <br />Environmental needs <br /> <br />A 'Watershed Experiment" should be capable of addressing issues of Environmental <br />Sustainability within that Watershed, including water quality, stream flow standards, and <br />protection of endangered species, while at the same time satisfying the overall water <br />requirements of the inhabitants of the watershed such as ranchers, farmers, residents of <br />townships, and industry. (The recommended research needs to be expanded to allow a <br />greater understanding of the long-term, extra-area effects of cloud seeding.) <br /> <br />A.3.1.8 <br /> <br />Technology transfer <br /> <br />To maximize the benefits of a 'Watershed Experiment," the experience gained should <br />be used to enhance the conduct of ongoing operational programs in the United States, <br />by transferring this new snowpack augmentation technology. <br /> <br />A.3.2 Task B - Rain Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies <br /> <br />Growing season dryness and droughts typically reduce United States crop production <br />between 10 and 15 percent, with losses exceeding 30 percent in extreme years such as <br />1988. These reductions may increase in some areas as a result of global climate <br />change. Such water shortages also have serious impacts on municipalities and <br />industry. The application of atmospheric water resource management technology to <br />augment rainfall to reduce the direct effects of drought has recently seen a significant <br />upsurge in much of the western United States. In just the past five years, rainfall <br />augmentation activities in west and south Texas have expanded from 2.2 million acres <br />annually, to over 50 million acres. The entire state of Oklahoma is presently engaged in <br />similar efforts. <br /> <br />Summer rain augmentation experiments with single-cell and multi-cell convective clouds <br />continue to suggest varying results. This response variability is not fully understood, but <br />it appears to be linked to variations in cloud selection criteria and seeding execution. <br />Perhaps there has been inadequate sampling of variables in space and time. While the <br />randomized hygroscopic seeding results are viewed as very exciting, the chain of <br />physical events that might be responsible is not well understood in contrast to <br />glaciogenic seeding experiments. It is generally accepted that this second pillar of <br />scientific understanding is needed to reinforce the statistical results before such results <br />can be fully accepted. <br /> <br />The National Academy of Science Workshop report (2000) includes the following <br />recommendation for the future scientific directions in rainfall augmentation. The biggest <br />future need is to put all forms of cloud seeding, both glaciogenic and hygroscopic, on <br />stronger physical-statistical grounds. There is a perceived need worldwide for rainfall <br />augmentation projects. Scientific knowledge badly lags the perceived need. Without a <br />systematic research effort organized to address the most pressing scientific <br />uncertainties, this gap is certain to widen. The following areas using new observational <br />tools, laboratory studies and numerical modeling are deemed as necessary steps for <br />future progress: <br /> <br />7 <br />