My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10379
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10379
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:19 AM
Creation date
10/25/2007 3:20:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Timnath
Stream Name
Cache La Poudre
Basin
South Platte
Title
CLOMR Application for Replacement of the Harmony Road Bridge at Cache La Poudre River
Date
2/21/2007
Prepared For
Kevin Houck, CWCB
Prepared By
Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br /> <br />E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL (CONTINUED) <br /> <br />7. Settlement <br /> <br />a. Has anticipated potential settlement been determined and incorporated into the specified construction elevations to maintain the <br />established freeboard margin? 0 Yes 0 No <br /> <br />b. The computed range of settlement is <br /> <br />fUo <br /> <br />ft. <br /> <br />c. Settlement of the levee crest is determined to be primarily from: <br /> <br />o Foundation consolidation <br />o Embankment compression <br />o Other (Describe): <br /> <br />d. Differential settlement offloodwalls 0 has 0 has not been accommodated in the structural design and construction. <br /> <br />Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. <br /> <br />8. Interior DrainaQe <br /> <br />a. Specify size of each interior watershed: <br /> <br />Draining to pressure conduit: <br />Draining to ponding area: <br /> <br />acres <br />acres <br /> <br />b. Relationships Established <br /> <br />Ponding elevation vs. storage <br />Ponding elevation vs. gravity flow <br />Differential head vs. gravity flow <br /> <br />DYes <br />DYes <br />DYes <br /> <br />DYes <br /> <br />DNo <br />DNo <br />DNo <br /> <br />DNo <br /> <br />C. The river flow duration curve is enclosed: <br /> <br />d. Specify the discharge capacity of the head pressure conduit: cfs <br /> <br />e. Which flooding conditions were analyzed? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Gravity flow (Interior Watershed) <br />Common storm (River Watershed) <br />Historical ponding probability <br />Coastal wave overtopping <br /> <br />DYes <br />DYes <br />DYes <br />DYes <br /> <br />DNo <br />DNo <br />DNo <br />DNo <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />If No for any of the above, attach explanation. <br /> <br />f. Interior drainage has been analyzed based on joint probability of interior and exterior flooding and the capacities of pumping and outlet <br />facilities to provide the established level of flood protection. 0 Yes 0 No <br /> <br />If No, attach explanation. <br /> <br />g. The rate of seepage through the levee system for the base flood is cfs <br /> <br />h. The length of levee system used to drive this seepage rate in item g: ft. <br /> <br />FEMA Form 81,898, SEP 02 <br /> <br />Riverine Structures Form <br /> <br />MT-2 Form 3 Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.