Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Implementation Assets <br /> <br />Grand Junction proceeds with at least four major strong <br />suits with regard to its riverfront. <br />First, one is the superb river resource itself. For all the scrap <br />and dereliction beside the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers, <br />the water bodies themselves are in good shape. The setting <br />is stunning and would be appreciated if people could get to <br />it comfortabl y. <br />Second is the presence of the approximately $60-million <br />Federal clean-up effort by the Department of Energy. It <br />represents an extranrdiTlllTy opportunity to affect change along <br />the river. It is critical that the City's efforts be linked as closely <br />as possible to the timetable for the clean-up, and conversely <br />that the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project be <br />coordinated with the City and the Riverfront Commission <br />so as not to take an action inconsistent with local objectives. <br />The possible provision of a new City/County staff person to <br />provide day-to-day coordination would be most beneficial, par- <br />ticularly if possessing a planning background to supplement <br />existing City resources. <br />Third is the existence of a Riverfront Commission with <br />proven leadership and community respect. Many communities <br />never get to this level, or take months to create such a body. <br />Fourth is the general political acumen in Grand Junction, <br />the City's prominence in Colorado and, not least, a supportive <br />media. <br /> <br />Specifics <br /> <br />- Coordinate with the Department of Energy and its con- <br />sultants in the mill tailings clean-up. If done right this will <br />make the overall river transformation possible, and if not done <br />right, could be a long-term setback. There should be a stated <br />determination in the community that auto wrecks, once <br />removed from the riverfront, should not, repeat not, be moved <br />back to this area by the Federal taxpayers. We think the City <br />should be prepared to use its ultimate authority of condem- <br />nation to bar private property owners from insisting that <br />salvage be returned to the river once removed. The <br />psychological impact of clearing the riverfront, making it at <br />once attractive to residents and passersby, only to have it again <br />devoted to wreck storage, would be a severe blow. <br />- An obvious companion to coordination with the Depart- <br />ment of Energy is accelerated effort to acquire the key river <br />parcels. These were identified, as belonging to Messieurs Dunn, <br />Lewis and Jarvis. This is ongoing and there is little we can <br />add except to say that securing these major parcels for public <br />ownership, by donation, swap or outright purchase, is the key <br />action underwriting the National Endowment for the Arts <br />team's suggestions. <br />- As soon as a piece of riverfront comes into the hands <br />of the Commission, through donation as has occurred, land <br />swap or through purchase, an immediate effort should be made <br />to accomplish several things. First, one is to encourage a <br />clean-up. Perhaps this is a responsibility of the suggested <br />Friends of the Rivers, working with City and County crews. <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />Second is to erect a sign labeling the area as part of the "River- <br />front Rejuvenation", or however the Commission styles its <br />effort, together with its logo. Third would be to install a <br />pathway. The idea is to put into place right away a piece of <br />what will eventually become a riverfront reality, namely a con- <br />tinuous path for bikers, hikers and runners. Even if it does <br />not connect right away with any other piece of pathway, <br />,segments nonetheless will signal that the Commission is serious <br />about a public pathway along the Colorado and Gunnison <br />Rivers. <br />- Stage an event on the Van Gundy property beside Fifth <br />Street at the confluence of the two rivers. With the coopera- <br />tion of the property owner, the idea is to acquaint people with <br />the spectacular vista from this site. Whether an existing event <br />can be transferred here, or some new event sponsored by the <br />Commission is desired, is not important, it's getting people <br />in numbers to see for themselves what they have that's critical. <br />Perhaps a summer and winter solstice observance would be <br />appropriate to the site. <br />- We encourage an early clean-up weekend on Watson (or <br />as renamed, Lewis) Island. This requires the cooperation of <br />the property owners and will benefit from City cooperation <br />in providing heavy equipment. A Friends of the Rivers <br />volunteer organization might be set up by the Commission <br />to carry out such an effort. At the conclusion of a Saturday <br />or Sunday event, we recommend a party with beer and music. <br /> <br />RESOURCES: Bronx River Restoration, 375 East Fordham Rd., Bronx, N.Y. <br />104B5; 212/933-4079, <br />Mississippi River Revival, P.O. Box 10281, Minneapolis, Minn. 55440. <br />"Year of the River" - an overall river awareness campaign discussed in <br />Chapter 6 in Urban Watemonts '85, appended. Contact: River Action <br />Inc" Box 964, Quad Cities, Iowa 52805; 303/322-2969. <br /> <br />Salvage Yard North of Watson Island <br /> <br /> <br />