<br />Implementation Assets
<br />
<br />Grand Junction proceeds with at least four major strong
<br />suits with regard to its riverfront.
<br />First, one is the superb river resource itself. For all the scrap
<br />and dereliction beside the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers,
<br />the water bodies themselves are in good shape. The setting
<br />is stunning and would be appreciated if people could get to
<br />it comfortabl y.
<br />Second is the presence of the approximately $60-million
<br />Federal clean-up effort by the Department of Energy. It
<br />represents an extranrdiTlllTy opportunity to affect change along
<br />the river. It is critical that the City's efforts be linked as closely
<br />as possible to the timetable for the clean-up, and conversely
<br />that the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project be
<br />coordinated with the City and the Riverfront Commission
<br />so as not to take an action inconsistent with local objectives.
<br />The possible provision of a new City/County staff person to
<br />provide day-to-day coordination would be most beneficial, par-
<br />ticularly if possessing a planning background to supplement
<br />existing City resources.
<br />Third is the existence of a Riverfront Commission with
<br />proven leadership and community respect. Many communities
<br />never get to this level, or take months to create such a body.
<br />Fourth is the general political acumen in Grand Junction,
<br />the City's prominence in Colorado and, not least, a supportive
<br />media.
<br />
<br />Specifics
<br />
<br />- Coordinate with the Department of Energy and its con-
<br />sultants in the mill tailings clean-up. If done right this will
<br />make the overall river transformation possible, and if not done
<br />right, could be a long-term setback. There should be a stated
<br />determination in the community that auto wrecks, once
<br />removed from the riverfront, should not, repeat not, be moved
<br />back to this area by the Federal taxpayers. We think the City
<br />should be prepared to use its ultimate authority of condem-
<br />nation to bar private property owners from insisting that
<br />salvage be returned to the river once removed. The
<br />psychological impact of clearing the riverfront, making it at
<br />once attractive to residents and passersby, only to have it again
<br />devoted to wreck storage, would be a severe blow.
<br />- An obvious companion to coordination with the Depart-
<br />ment of Energy is accelerated effort to acquire the key river
<br />parcels. These were identified, as belonging to Messieurs Dunn,
<br />Lewis and Jarvis. This is ongoing and there is little we can
<br />add except to say that securing these major parcels for public
<br />ownership, by donation, swap or outright purchase, is the key
<br />action underwriting the National Endowment for the Arts
<br />team's suggestions.
<br />- As soon as a piece of riverfront comes into the hands
<br />of the Commission, through donation as has occurred, land
<br />swap or through purchase, an immediate effort should be made
<br />to accomplish several things. First, one is to encourage a
<br />clean-up. Perhaps this is a responsibility of the suggested
<br />Friends of the Rivers, working with City and County crews.
<br />
<br />28
<br />
<br />Second is to erect a sign labeling the area as part of the "River-
<br />front Rejuvenation", or however the Commission styles its
<br />effort, together with its logo. Third would be to install a
<br />pathway. The idea is to put into place right away a piece of
<br />what will eventually become a riverfront reality, namely a con-
<br />tinuous path for bikers, hikers and runners. Even if it does
<br />not connect right away with any other piece of pathway,
<br />,segments nonetheless will signal that the Commission is serious
<br />about a public pathway along the Colorado and Gunnison
<br />Rivers.
<br />- Stage an event on the Van Gundy property beside Fifth
<br />Street at the confluence of the two rivers. With the coopera-
<br />tion of the property owner, the idea is to acquaint people with
<br />the spectacular vista from this site. Whether an existing event
<br />can be transferred here, or some new event sponsored by the
<br />Commission is desired, is not important, it's getting people
<br />in numbers to see for themselves what they have that's critical.
<br />Perhaps a summer and winter solstice observance would be
<br />appropriate to the site.
<br />- We encourage an early clean-up weekend on Watson (or
<br />as renamed, Lewis) Island. This requires the cooperation of
<br />the property owners and will benefit from City cooperation
<br />in providing heavy equipment. A Friends of the Rivers
<br />volunteer organization might be set up by the Commission
<br />to carry out such an effort. At the conclusion of a Saturday
<br />or Sunday event, we recommend a party with beer and music.
<br />
<br />RESOURCES: Bronx River Restoration, 375 East Fordham Rd., Bronx, N.Y.
<br />104B5; 212/933-4079,
<br />Mississippi River Revival, P.O. Box 10281, Minneapolis, Minn. 55440.
<br />"Year of the River" - an overall river awareness campaign discussed in
<br />Chapter 6 in Urban Watemonts '85, appended. Contact: River Action
<br />Inc" Box 964, Quad Cities, Iowa 52805; 303/322-2969.
<br />
<br />Salvage Yard North of Watson Island
<br />
<br />
<br />
|