Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HYDROLOGY ADVISORY GROUP <br />12-15-01 <br />Discussion Notes <br /> <br />M... <br />.....;:..... <br />:t~ <br /> <br />Can we create a new standard? <br /> <br />Kevin: Urban Drainage caution: <br /> <br />Q what a change of standard implies <br />Q Urban Drainage question: why? <br />Q Use risk calculations - adopt a higher standard <br />Q Biggest question: how do we get a master plan for South <br />Boulder Creek? <br /> <br />Define "standard" <br /> <br />The problem/task of the group is to work on new hydrology <br />Or .add-on hydrology - focus on South Boulder Creek <br /> <br />Alan expects that in so doing there will be potential applications for <br />Larger city/County use. <br /> <br />Alan's presentation: overview of history and status of the Phase A process for <br />South Boulder Creek <br /> <br />.. Group needs to construct and agree to a problem statement to gUide <br />the work. <br /> <br />.. What else does the group need to proceed? <br /> <br />(from Alan's presentation) PROBLEM STATEMENT: <br />"What can we do to ...ggt a really good hydrology. . . <br />. . . climatology <br /> <br />. .. hydraulics <br /> <br />that will have community confidence ? <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />