Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Upon completion of the Phase A report (Reference 22), the project sponsors reviewed the Phase A <br />report recommendations and selected improvements for preliminary design. Their final selections <br />are presented in a letter from Urban Drainage and Flood Control District to WRC on March 6, 1997. <br />Included in Appendix B are copies of all correspondence regarding this project received during the <br />Phase - A performance of this project. Included in Appendix C are copies of all correspondence <br />regarding this project received subsequent to the Phase A report. This information, along with the <br />project and public meeting minutes, the Phase A report, and the FHAD report, provides a complete <br />documentation of the project progress leading up to and including the preparation of this Phase B <br />report. <br />1-5 <br /> <br />and the questionnaire response summary are included in <br /> <br />minutes, <br /> <br />of the public meeting agendas, <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Appendix A. <br /> <br />PROJECT HISTORY AND CORRESPONDENCE <br /> <br />H. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />meetings were held with the Project Advisory Committee to discuss various <br /> <br />series of project <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />aspects of the project, to obtain information and guidance from the project sponsors, and to present <br /> <br />In addition, photographs and videotape of the <br /> <br />progress. <br />were presented to <br /> <br />results at the various stages ofthe study's <br /> <br />Also, a field trip to various reaches <br /> <br />the committee. <br /> <br />1995 runoff event <br /> <br />May] 7, <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />summary of the project <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />1995 <br /> <br />of Big Dry Creek was taken by the committee on August 23, <br /> <br />meeting minutes during Phase A are included in the Alternatives Evaluation Report (Reference 22) <br /> <br />I: <br /> <br />meetings during Phase B are as follows: <br /> <br />summary of project <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION <br /> <br />Discussion on Public Meeting timing and the sponsor's selected plan. <br />Preliminary Design Report to include conceptual details of <br />improvements. Design of low flow check structures for aesthetics <br />was discussed. WRC directed to explore an alternative to the selected <br />improvements (siphon) at the Denver Highline Canal. Preliminary <br />Design Report to include cost comparison of improvements versus <br />property values upstream of Orchard Road. Sizing of improvements <br />upstream of Santa Fe Drive was also discussed. <br /> <br />DATE <br /> <br />997 <br /> <br />April 1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />Discussions centered on specific improvements to be included in the <br />final report. These specific improvements included: channel design <br />from South Platte River to upstream of South Windermere Street; Big <br />Dry Creek crossing at the Denver Highline Canal; future detention <br />basins in Douglas County; typical slope stabilization methods and <br />selection criteria; and water quality considerations at outfalls <br /> <br />1997 <br /> <br />May 6, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />impl'Ovements. <br />997 public meeting was <br />conceptual design of <br />Canal was presented and <br /> <br />Draft detail drawings of proposed slope stabilization (overbank <br />improvements) and low flow checks were distributed and discussed. <br />Other special drainageway improvements such as grouted sloping <br />boulder drop structures and utility protection were also discussed. <br />Further refinements were made to the overbank <br />Information to be presented at the May 28, <br />reviewed and discussed. An optional <br />at the Denver Highline <br /> <br />improvements <br />discussed. <br /> <br />May 20, 1997 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The results meeting were discussed. Additional <br />discussions n the draft improvement details and the <br />proposed improvements for the Denver Highline Canal. Priority of <br />improvements were discussed including jurisdictional priorities and <br />watershed -wide priorities. <br /> <br />of the public <br />were held 0 <br /> <br />1997 <br /> <br />June 3 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />