My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00270
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:01 PM
Creation date
10/22/2007 11:55:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
The Southern Plains Experiment in Cloud Seeding of Thunderstorms for Rainfall Augmentation Phase II β(SPECTRA)β
Prepared For
The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Prepared By
Woodley Weather Consultants
Date
12/28/2005
State
TX
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
measurements in the salt plume. This was made possible by the son of Dr. Daniel Rosenfeld, Mr. Amir <br />Rosenfeld, who wrote a software package that: 1) accepts the GPS coordinates of the project aircraft in flight <br />and presents their tracks in real time on the screen of a lap-top computer in the cockpit of the lead cloud physics <br />aircraft, 2) marks the positions of the seeder and cloud physics aircraft and/or an event, such as the detected <br />"hit" of SF6 gas and then repetitively navigates back to this point as it drifts with the ambient wind, 3) displays <br />along the track of the cloud physics aircraft when it was in cloud, 4) displays in real-time the plots of measured <br />aircraft parameters such as cloud droplet sizes and cloud liquid water contents as a function of time, and 5) <br />presents the aircraft navigation information in a form useful to the pilot. All of this is illustrated in Figure 1, <br />which gives the presentation available in the aircraft cockpit during a portion of the flight on May 31, 2005. <br /> The content of Figure 1 needs careful exposition. North is at the top of the figure and tick marks for <br />latitude and longitude are on the left and top, respectively. The tracks of the base-seeder and the monitoring <br />cloud-physics aircraft are shown in yellow and green, respectively. At the time of the depiction (205846 GMT) <br />the base seeder aircraft had ceased seeding and moved off to the southwest. The shaded areas along the track of <br />the cloud physics aircraft show when it was in cloud. The initial seeding in this case seeding was at 205235 <br />GMT, so the depiction is roughly 6 minutes later. The track of the seeder was essentially NW-SE during the <br />seeding. Note that most of the monitoring took place in the cloud slightly to the ENE of the seeding activity. <br />o <br />This makes sense since the GPS-derived winds at the flight level of the cloud physics aircraft was from 257at <br />-1 <br />11 m s (22 kts), so the cloud had drifted to the ENE. <br />-3 <br /> An inset plot for the cloud liquid water (red plot, left scale in gm m) and for the voltage for the SF <br />6 <br />detector (green plot, right scale) is given in the upper left of the figure where the most recent time is shown on <br />the extreme right. Examination of these plots reveals a major βhitβ of SF, leaving no doubt that the cloud <br />6 <br />physics aircraft had intercepted the seeded plume, making it possible to compare cloud microphysical structure <br />within the plume to the structure outside the plume.Based on careful ground tests it was determined that there <br />was a lag of 7 sec between the intake of SF gas and its detection by the detector. The inset plot has been <br />6 <br />corrected for this lag, amounting to about 700 m. The portion of the green track of the Cheyenne where a hitof <br />SF was observed is shown in red on the track. Upon marking this hit in real time, it ispossible to return to this <br />6 <br />seeded volume time and again as long as it can be done safely. In this case, however, the overall cloud had <br />become quite vigorous, making it unwise to attempt repetitive traverses of the affected cloud region. Multiple <br />returns to the originally seeded area were possible, however, in the second case on this day. These will be <br />discussed extensively in the results section of this Final Report. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.