My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12629 (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12629 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:18:45 PM
Creation date
10/22/2007 8:15:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Program
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/15/2001
Author
Thomas P. Nesler CDOW
Title
Stocking Plan for Endangered Colorado River Fish Species in Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Given that the adult Colorado pikeminnow population is about 4 fish/mile in the Grand <br />Valley reach and 3-3.4 fish/mile in the Utah reach below Westwater, and recruitment of strong <br />year classes is currently infrequent, depletion of the donor population from either source appears <br />possible. If one considers the lower ends of the interval estimates provided in Osmundson and <br />Burnham (161 and 186 fish) rather than the midpoints, which are within the 95 % confidence limits <br />for estimated population size, then depletion of the donor population seems possible. Given a <br />survival rate of O. ~6 and the translocation of 10 fish/year, it would require the translocation of <br />100 adults over a 10 year period to create a new population of 55 fish. Reliance upon occurrence <br />of another strong year class during the period of translocation effects seems risky for a population <br />considered vulnerable to extinction from stochastic demographic changes. <br /> <br />This should not be construed as opposition to translocation as part of the strategy for <br />establishing Colorado pikeminnow populations in the unoccupied reaches of the upper Colorado <br />and Gunnison rivers. In addition to fish that use the Redlands passageway, it would also appear <br />desirable to translocate similar-sized fish captured immediately below the barrier within the plunge <br />pool downstream of the dam. This can be viewed as assisting the passage of fish that cannot or <br />will not use the constructed passageway and facilitating natural mechanisms of migration, dispersal <br />and recruitment. Osmundson et al. (1996) demonstrated significantly greater nonspawning <br />movements upstream for juvenile/early adult Colorado pikeminnow than for larger, older adults. <br />Though not stated explicitly by Osmundson et al., this attribute may be evidence of a population <br />dispersal mechanism by which young fish recruit into and thus maintain the upstream adult <br />populations. The use of the Redlands passage structure by mostly smaller, late juvenile Colorado <br />pikeminnow in 1996 (1 fish), 1997 (18 fish), 1998 (23 fish), 1999 (5 fish), and 2000 (4 fish) <br />(Burdick 2(01) may be intetpreted as preliminary support of this dispersal! recruitment hypothesis. <br />Without benefit of passage at the Colorado River barriers above Palisade, similar translocation of <br />Colorado pikeminnow captured below the barriers should be considered. <br /> <br />Natural recolonization of the upper Colorado River reach is also possible with the <br />placement of passageways around existing barriers similar to Redlands on the Gunnison, but the <br />success of these devices in terms of use by Colorado pikeminnow has yet to be established, both <br />in terms of numbers of fish and the contribution of observed rates of passage (e.g. number of fish <br />per season) to population goals for the Gunnison River or recovery goals for the species. Similar <br />to the translocation approach, though perhaps even more variable in terms of progress, natural <br />recolonization could require a long time period to establish an adult population of even 4 fish/ mile <br />(200 fish total) similar to the Grand Valley reach now. So that the Recovery Program may <br />achieve progress toward recovery goals in a timely manner, we recommend the stocking of <br />genetically compatible Colorado pikeminnow as a primary approach to extending the species range <br />and establishing adult populations within the unoccupied reach of the upper Colorado River and <br />in the Gunnison River. We further recommend that translocation of wild Colorado pikeminnow <br />of the appropriate life stage/size group continue as a supplementary approach, using fish (400-550 <br />mm) captured in the plunge pools and immediate downstream reaches below the instream barriers <br />at Redlands on the Gunnison River and Price-Stubb and HigWine on the Colorado River. Finally, <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.