Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rlr2~~17 <br />~ U U.,. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />project costrper acre-foot to CWD is about <br />..- ' <br />$26, which includes water purchase costs. <br />pipeline capital costs, and annual opera- <br />tion and mamtenance expenses. This <br />compares favorably to CWD's current sur- <br />, face water costs (for example, SWP water <br />costs are about $75 per acre-foot) and <br />groundwater costs, which range fmm $90 <br />to $140 per acre-foot. <br /> <br />A requirement of this <br />project is cornprehen- <br />sive rnonitoting of the <br />treatment process and <br />fmal water quiility to en- <br />'sure the water meets <br />state and federal water <br />quality requirements. <br />. Permit requirements are <br />administered by the <br />Central Valley Regional <br />Water Quality Control <br />Board. <br /> <br />American Basin Conjunctive Use <br />Project <br /> <br />. TOCCOY DUDLEY is a senior engineering <br />.peologiEt with DWR's Central District. <br /> <br />This article profiles ajuture water man- <br />agement option under considergtionfor the <br />-State Water Project. As <br />we prepare Bulletin <br />160-98, we are compi/inti <br />information about watep <br />management options be- <br />iQg evaluated by local <br />agencies. by the Swp. <br />and by federal water <br />projects. <br /> <br />" This project clearly <br />demonstrates that <br />something good for the <br />environment and <br />something good for <br />business do not have to <br />be mutually exclusive... <br />[and] disproves the old <br />axiom that oil and water <br />cannot mix. " <br /> <br />DWR is looking at po- <br />tential conJunctive use <br />projects in the Sacra- <br />mento Valley to improve <br />the SWP's dry year water <br />supply reliability. flne <br />such project, the Ameri- <br />can Basin conjunctive <br />use project. is nearing <br />the end of the feasibility <br />phase of development. <br />The proposed project <br />area is in southeastern <br />, Sutter County. western <br />Placer County, and northwestern Sacra- <br />mento ~ounty. Local water purveyors par- <br />ticipating in the project are: <br />/ ' <br />. South Sutter Water District <br /> <br />. Natomas-Central Mutual Water <br />Company <br /> <br />. Pleasant Grove-Verona Mutual Water <br />Company '- <br />. Placer County Water Agency <br /> <br />The Cawe10 Water <br />District-Texaco Oil <br />Company Water Con- <br />servation Project re~ <br />~eived an award fill" Dis- <br />tinguished Service in <br />Environmental Plan- <br />ning, which was pr~s- \ <br />ented at the 1996 In- <br />ternational Development Research Council <br />World Congress in New Orleans. In ac- <br />cepting the award, Dean Bears. assistant <br />division manager of Texaco E.& p. Inc.. <br />and John Jones, district manager ofCWD. <br />said, 'This project clearly demonstrates" <br />that something good for the environment <br />and something good for business do riot <br />have to be mutually exclusive." Theyadd- <br />, ,- <br />ed that uthis disproves the old axiorn that <br />oil and water cannot mix." II <br /> <br />-Dean Bears, Texaco E&P, Inc. <br />and <br />-John Jones, CWO <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />13 <br />