Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />uQ2547 <br /> <br />The BHBF being proposed for 1998 will consist of2-4 days of flows less than or equal to 45,000 <br />cfs sometime during betWeen the months of January through June of 1998. No flows of 8,000 cfs <br />are proposed to immediately precede or follow this 45,000 cfs flow, In addition, it is proposed <br />that the duration of the BHBF be determined based on real-time monitoring of sediment <br />deposition, biological and cultural resources. and that the experimental flow be concluded at the <br />point of diminishing sediment suspension and deposition at critical sites in the sediment-starved <br />Marble Canyon reach. The upramping will begin from the highest point in the existing daily <br />powerplant release hydrograph at a proposed rate of 4,000 cfslhr, The downramping will begin, <br />once maximum sediment deposition has been achieved, at a proposed rate of 1,500 cfslhr until <br />flows rejoin the existing daily powerplant release hydro graph. <br /> <br />Adllptive Mllnllvement Objectives. The 1996 BHBF was conducted as an experiment to study <br />planned flooding as a management tool for restoration and preservation of Colorado River <br />ecosystem resources, The primary goals of the 1996 BHBF were to learn about sediment <br />transport under high flows and to mobilize and redeposit channel-stored sand as higher-elevation <br />bars. Additional objectives included preservation of cultural resources, providing more natural <br />flood-disturbance processes to riparian vegetation, rejuvenation of other important channel <br />features such as backwater habitats, and flushing non-native fishes from critical areas in <br />downstream reaches, Of the eight objectives generally listed in the GCDEIS, the 1996 BHBF <br />achieved five that were mostly related to sediment transport and deposition, <br /> <br />I. The 1998 BHBF will provide scientific benefit by allowing researchers to test conclusions <br />developed from the results of the 1996 BHBF regarding modes and rates of sediment <br />deposition, <br /> <br />2. The 1998 BHBF is being proposed, initially as a management action to mitigate against <br />the predicted negative effects on sediment resources of high steady releases or unplanned <br />spills which could occur based on early forecasts in WY98, <br /> <br />3, Based on the "State of the Colorado River ecosystem" report, and subject to the <br />acceptance of the recommendations of the "Risk of Spill" workgroup, the 1998 BHBF is <br />also being proposed as a management action that can be designed to benefit natural, <br />cultural, socio-economic, and recreational resources, <br /> <br />TIMING AND COMPLIANCE <br /> <br />Potential conflicts with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion and National Park <br />Service and Bureau of Reclamation cultural resource management needs may exist and should be <br />addressed by the TWG and the AMWG, Of specific concerns are habitat and incidental take <br />issues related to the endangered Kanab ambersnail, Humpback chub, and Southwestern willow <br />flycatcher, In addition, the effect on other biological resources such as the Lees Ferry trout <br />fishery, the aquatic food base, and riparian vegetation will need to be considered prior to making <br />final decisions regarding the magnitude, duration, and timing of a BHBF, Compliance required <br />under the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Historic <br />Preservation Act will need to be determined and initiated, as appropriate, <br /> <br />3 <br />