Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft: Test Flood Effects on Lake Powell <br /> <br />0025i.8 <br /> <br />which may pose hazards in-lake and downstream to both <br />living organisms and to metal surfaces, such as the <br />powerplant turbines. Drought conditions have resulted in <br />several episodes of pronounced meromixis in Lake Powell <br />since 1963, including the years preceding the test flood. <br />Likewise, stagnation and DO demand has produced <br />hypolimnetic hypoxia (as low as 1.4 mg DOlL near the <br />dam). Extremely low DO concentrations have not yet <br />reached discharge elevations (a minimum of 4.5 mg DOlL <br />has been recorded at the penstock elevation). <br />Meromictic stagnation is one result of dam design. <br />Another is that the river outlet works are located deeper in <br />the hypolimnion, although they are seldom used since they <br />bypass power generation. Their location and operation <br />affects meromixis as they draw entirely from the <br />hypolimnion except during the lowest lake stage. Data <br />suggest that higher flow-through, and ROW withdrawals <br />may diminish the extent ofhypolimnetic meromixis. <br />The existence and operation of Glen Canyon Dam <br />(OCD) has significantly altered post-dam water quality in <br />Glen and Orand Canyon (Stevens ef al. 1997). Seasonal <br />variations in river flow, temperature, turbidity and ionic <br />concentrations have been reduced to uniformly cold. clear, <br />low nutrient waters that vary more on a daily and weekly <br />basis than historic seasonal patterns. Water quality and <br />discharge below the dam is now dictated by reservoir water <br />quality and the dam operations (Stanford and Ward 1986, <br />1991, Angradi ef al. 1992). Interactions between the <br />magnitude, duration, frequency, timing, and location of <br />discharges from the dam influence uplake water quality <br />which. in turn, determine downstream water quality. The <br />effects of the large discharges and deep withdrawals occur <br />in the context of seasonallimnological processes. obscuring <br />cause and effect relationships. Historical data allow <br />comparisons of similar antecedent conditions without large <br />discharges. <br />The 1996 test flood provided an opportunity to <br />quantify these effects and elucidate the linkage between <br />reservoir and downstream water quality. In this paper we <br />address the following objectives: (1) describe the historical <br />development of Lake Powell limnology; (2) determine <br />whether the test flood's larger penstock discharges and <br />releases from alternate structures affect Lake Powell <br />limnology; (3) determine the extent of discharge required to <br />produce measurable effects and how far uplake such effects <br />are detected; and (4) determine the impacts on down-river <br />water quality. The large historical database (1964 through <br />1997), and the large size of this reservoir make it an <br />excellent study site. Analysis of the limnological changes <br />associated with a single, large discharge event may <br />contribute to improved management of this and other large <br />reservoirs that develop meromixis or hypoxia, in addition <br />to improving the linkage to downstream water quality. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Study Area <br />Glen Canyon Dam was completed in 1963, part of a <br />series of dams resulting from the 1922 Colorado River <br />Compact and the 1956 Colorado River Storage Act, <br />providing for allocation and storage of water across the arid <br />Colorado River basin. OCD is a 216.4 m high arch <br />construction dam (Fig. 1). It provides 3 routes of release for <br />the reservoir's water. Eight penstocks located 70 m below <br />full pool elevation are the primary release structures. These <br />can release a maximum of 940 mlls to the 8 turbines for <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />power generation, but are constrained to 892 ml/s. The <br />penstock draft tubes release below the surface of the <br />tailwater pool. limiting aeration effects. Two alternate <br />release structures may be used for greater discharge <br />capacity; but both bypass power generation and their use is <br />avoided. The ROW are located 99 m below full pool (29 m <br />below penstock outlets) and can discharge 424 -566 m'/s. <br />Their greater depth facilitates hypolimnetic discharge. and <br />they have been used on 7 occasions since 1963. The <br />spillways draw from the epilimnion near the lake's surface <br />at a depth of 16 m below full pool, although the lake has <br />been below the spillways' operational levels over half the <br />lake's history. The spillways have a capacity of 5890 m'/s <br />to accommodate a 1 DO-year flood event, and have only <br />been used in 1980, 1983 and 1984 (USSR 1970, 1995). <br />QeD is one of the largest U.S. reservoirs; located in <br />southern Utah and northern Arizona of southwestern USA. <br />(Fig. 2). It first reached full pool in 1980, and has a <br />maximum depth of 160 m. a surface area of 653 lan1, a <br />length of 300 km, a volume of 32.1 lan' and approximately <br />3200 km of shoreline at the full pool elevation of 1128 m <br />amsl (USSR 1970, 1995). The region has an arid <br />continental climate-- annual precipitation is 200 rom/year <br />and pan evaporation is 1800 mmlyear (Potter and Drake <br />1989). <br />Lake Powell is an oligotrophic lake (potter and Drake <br />1989) with low nutrient levels; mean total phosphorus is <br />0.01-0.02 mg-PIL, total kjeIdahl nitrogen ~ 0.16-0.2 mg- <br />NIL. Results from the 30+ year long-term Lake Powell <br />monitoring program (LPMP) identify Powell as a warm <br />meromictic reservoir; it has never completely mixed since <br />its fonnation. It has a chemocline that persists near the <br />depth of the penstock withdrawals. This meromictic <br />hypolimnion, or monimolimnion, contains relatively <br />stagnant water with elevated salinity (750 J.1S/cm to <br />1200 itS/em), cold temperatures (6-90C) and depressed DO <br />(1.5-7 mg/L). <br />A previous period of meromixis at Lake Powell was <br />disrupted by high inflows and multiple. level discharges in <br />the 1980's during 5 years of exceptionally high inflows. <br />The spillways (near the surface) and the ROW were <br />operated on several occasions for extended periods in 1980 <br />and from 1983 to 1986. Combined with 3 years of high <br />flow.through and multiple level withdrawals, the lake <br />achieved a unique level of homogeneity in June 1985, with <br />a conductance gradient 2.8 times less than the average for <br />the lake's history. Data collection in the 1980's, however, <br />was sporadic, with only 2 to 5 lake-wide collections/yr. <br />Trends were discerned, but relationships between darn <br />operations and uplake processes were less clear. We <br />expected that analyses of the test flood results would clarify <br />some of the effects observed in the 1980's. <br /> <br />Data Collection and Sampling Design <br />We utilized historical and ongoing data from our <br />LPMP, augmented with higher spatial and temporal <br />resolution data near the dam surrounding the test flood <br />(Fig. 2). The LPMP includes 25 long-term monitoring <br />stations. eight which have been sampled since 1964. The <br />test flood was bracketed by 2 full-lake quarterly LPMP <br />sampling trips in the weeks of 1 March and 6 June 1996. <br />These included 25 stations in the Colorado, Escalante and <br />San Juan River anns of Lake Powell. Using a Hydrolab <br />Surveyor H20T... multi-parameter submarine sonde, we <br />collected profiles of temperature (TOe), specific <br />