Laserfiche WebLink
<br />D02J9~ <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br /> 300 <br /> SAND BAR CHANGE <br /> 250 (abovl 425 cubic miter. per HCOnd) <br />lD ....- LIII Ftny ID UIIII Colando RIYw <br />aI 200 -..- UItlI ColoradO River to Diamond CrHIc <br />C <br />as <br />.c <br />0 150 <br />GI <br />E <br />~ 100 <br />- <br />0 <br />> <br />'/. 50 <br /> 0 <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />l- <br /> <br /> <br />----- <br /> <br />1991 <br /> <br /> <br />1994 <br />Time <br /> <br />1996 <br /> <br />1997 <br /> <br />-50 <br /> <br />Figure 2: Percent sand bar volume change upstream and downstream from the Little Colorado <br />River confluence, 1991-1997. Zero on the Y-axis represents the February 1996 condition. <br />immediately prior to the Marchi April 1996 Test Flow. Error bars are:!: 1 standard deviations. <br />Data courtesy of Parnell et al. 1997. Northern Arizona University. <br /> <br />Final Draft - 12/12/97 - For AMWG Review <br />