My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12491 (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12491 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:18:34 PM
Creation date
10/21/2007 8:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River Water Projects - Glen Canyon Dam-Lake Powell - Adaptive Management
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/13/1998
Author
AZ-CO-NV-NM-UT-WY
Title
Proposal for Interim Lake Mead Reservoir Operation Guidelines Related to Surplus-Normal-and Shortage Year Declarations - Six State Proposal - Straw Man Drafts - 10-13-98 and 11-04-98
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OCT-16-98 FRJ: <br />, , <br /> <br />11:03 UPPER COLORADO RJ:VER COMM <br />OQ,,\f)'Jl <br />U...., t <br /> <br />P.03 <br /> <br />Six State Proposal <br />Straw Man Draft <br />October 13, 1998 <br /> <br />States have insisted that California demonstrate a serious commitment to reduce its water use <br />~~\~ ~ . .. th I h ~ '1' th <br />before entertaining discussions of4J:anS~r7' _II' operatmg cntena at mlg t ~aclltate at <br /> <br />reduction. <br /> <br />The Six States now believe that a reasonable draft plan has been formulated by California <br /> <br />and sufficient commitment to the plan's implementation h~s been demonstrated by water users in <br /> <br />California to allow the initiation of discussions on~~ ~ operating criteria. <br /> <br /> <br />The purpose of this paper is to describe the parameters o~~~ criteria that would be <br />1M ~ <br />acceptable to the Six States. . <br /> <br />II. Consistency with the Law of the River . <br /> <br />. ICI\~~ <br />J.t gees withew: saying that the jhy MWvteml'erary operating criteria implemented to <br /> <br />assist California in its program t! ~~ its dependence on Colorado River water above its <br /> <br />basic apportionment must be consistent with the Law of the River. Of particular importance in <br /> <br />developing the ~ the apportionment system specified by the United States <br />'''+efit....... <br />Supreme Court for distributing all water in the Colorado River mainstream among the Lower <br /> <br />Division States of Arizona, California and Nevada. Any water diverted into one of the three <br /> <br />Lower Division States must fit within one of three categories: <br /> <br />a) The water diverted is within that state's basic apportionment. Article <br /> <br />Il(B)(1) of the Decree, 374 U.S. 340 (1964). <br /> <br />b) The water diverted is water that has been declared by the Secretary of the <br /> <br />Interior as surplus water available above the 7.5 mafbasic apportionment available to the <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.