Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tv- <br /> <br />1 <br />j <br />1 <br />~ <br />~ <br />'- <br /> <br />~ <br />.... <br />o <br />~ <br /> <br />ooa2~4 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ +o~Jt;cP(g,~C'>) <br />\J~o~ J5l- j. <br />? trr~ <br /> <br />Six State Proposal <br />Straw Man Draft <br />Includes Fassett and Mutz comments <br />11/4/98 <br /> <br />available as surplus, only 50% of that amount is available to California, unless Arizona or <br /> <br />Nevada choose not to divert and use the 46% and 4% of the swplus amount that is <br /> <br />available to those states, respectively. Article II(B)(2). <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />c) The water diverted is water that was available to one of the other Lower f~ <br />?Ol? ~ <br />Division States in accordance with a) or b), above, but was unused by that state. ArtiCle uJ" \ <br /> <br />II(B)(6). <br /> <br />Irvt~ ~ <br /> <br />ill. <br /> <br /> <br />Other Polic <br /> <br />In addition to the nee for the proposed interim reservoir operating criteria to be <br /> <br />consistent with t~~ of the River, the Six States assert that, as a matter of fairness to <br /> <br />all Colorado River Basin States, the process of developing and promulgating ncw, tcmporary <br /> <br />interim criteria be consistent with the following principles: <br /> <br />1) The federal government and California must affirmatively recognize that new; <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />opcrating critcria must be. onlyThe interim andoperating criteria will be in effect only during the <br /> <br />transition period in California water use. The. additional water made avai:lablc to California during <br /> <br />this pc.riod cannot be. sce.fi ~ a pCIrnancnt substitute for the unused Arizona and Nevada basic <br /> <br />apportionments tlpon which California has historically relied. Thus, the newinterim operating <br /> <br />criteria must expire by their own terms in 2010, unless affirmatively renewed untilno later than <br /> <br />2015. The. criteria must a:l!o pro ride that the criteria will expnc when it is established that: <br /> <br />California hitS achieved its goal of li ving within its bitSic 4.4 mar annual apportiomuc.ntHowever, <br /> <br />3 <br />