My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12491 (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12491 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:18:34 PM
Creation date
10/21/2007 8:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River Water Projects - Glen Canyon Dam-Lake Powell - Adaptive Management
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/13/1998
Author
AZ-CO-NV-NM-UT-WY
Title
Proposal for Interim Lake Mead Reservoir Operation Guidelines Related to Surplus-Normal-and Shortage Year Declarations - Six State Proposal - Straw Man Drafts - 10-13-98 and 11-04-98
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O'CT-16-98 FR 1: <br /> <br />11:07 UPPER COLORADO R1:VER COMM <br />000231 <br /> <br />P. 10 <br /> <br />Six State Proposal <br />Straw Man Draft <br />October 13, 1998 <br /> <br />various levels are less distinct. It envisions a more continuous set of guidelines depending upon <br /> <br />reservoir conditions, inflow into the reservoir system, and the need for water within the Lower <br /> <br />Basin states and Mexico. The Six State proposal seeks to achieve a balance between the need to <br /> <br />release water to build storage space to avoid future floods and the need to carry over as much <br /> <br />water in storage as possible to sustain future water deliveries through droughts. Similar to the <br /> <br />California proposal, the Six States are willing to provide California with additional water for a <br /> <br />specified period of time while conservation measures are being implemented. The States believe <br /> <br />that when California is successful in implementing its conservation programs it will be able to <br /> <br />meet its future needs within its 4.4 million acre foot annual entitlement and, therefore, there will <br /> <br />be no need to continue with the proposed form of reservoir operating criteria in the future. <br /> <br />Underlying all levels of the surplus criteria is the commitment to attempt to meet the <br /> <br />needs of southern California municipal and industrial water users which causes the state to use <br /> <br />more than its 4.4 mar basic apportionment. While this volume is expected to reduce <br /> <br />continuously over time, it is still a significant amount of water and in the early years of the <br /> <br />proposal could easily exceed the amount of water available from spill avoidance strategies. The <br /> <br />six states proposal also includes a small amount of water for municipal uses in Southern Nevada <br /> <br />which are anticipated to meet Nevada's M&l needs above its basic apportionment of 0.3 maf <br /> <br />after about the year 2005. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.