My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10335
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:03 AM
Creation date
10/19/2007 11:55:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Mesa
Stream Name
Indian Wash
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Watershed Work Plan - Indian Wash Watershed, Mesa County, CO
Date
9/1/1961
Prepared By
Upper Grand Valley Soil Conservation District
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />..; <br /> <br />"l <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- 28 - <br /> <br />Flood routings were made on: (1) present condition, (2) <br />future condition with land.treatment only, and (3) future condition <br />Wit~ land treatment and structures. <br /> <br />.Each city block in the 'floodplain was 'considered as an evaluation <br />reach. Four peak rates of flow were associated with a dollar-damage <br />for each section along the floodplain and this infor.mation was then <br />used to construct discharge-damage curves for evaluation. <br /> <br />The routing reaches in these studies were based upon the known <br />pattern of in-channel and overbank flow that occurred in the June <br />1958 flood. Beginning at the High Line Canal, the floods were routed <br />downstream to each successive channel restriction, collecting enroute <br />the appropriate local inflow. All flows within the watershed were <br />thus accounted for and routed through the project area for each flood <br />condition. <br /> <br />The reservoiring effect of the High Line Canal was determined by <br />calculating its capacity over and above the normal flow of 600 c.f.s. <br />of irrigation water by water surface profiles. Flood routing then <br />determined the frequency at which overtopping would occur. An <br />additional reservoiring effect will be gained when the new Interstate <br />Highway that will cross the watershed parallel to and just north of <br />the High Line Canal is completed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Benefits fram the proposed land treatment measures were evaluated <br />to the extent in which floodwater and sediment storage could be <br />reduced. <br /> <br />The emergency spillway of structure TIv-l.was designed to pass <br />the freeboard hydxograph (7.Su of point precipitation = 5.6" of <br />runoff) without overtopping the dam. For comparison, the maximum <br />probable amount of point precipitation for Indian Wash as determined <br />by use of hydrologic data developed by the U. S. Weather Bureau for <br />the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation's nearby Blue l1esa Project was 7.2 <br />inches. <br /> <br />The IW-l reservoir will fully contain the volume of the spillway <br />hydrograph (3.0" of point precipitation = 1.71" of runoff) without <br />the emergency spillway operating. <br /> <br />Sedimentation Investigations <br /> <br />No previous records of sediment production were available for <br />the area included in the Indian \'lash Watershed. Sedimentation rates <br />at the proposed floodwater-retarding reservoir site were based on <br />rates that have been measured by the U. S. Geological Survey in the <br />nearby experimental Ba~ger Wash Watershed and on the results of a <br />reservoir sediment survey made at an old reservoir in the upper part <br />of the Indian Wash drainage area. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.