Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />- 11 - <br /> <br />In the area downstream from the High Line Canal, the channel of <br />Indian Wash is camparati vely stable for the average annual peak flow. <br />Little or no degrading of the channel is taking place, mainly because <br />of the presence of culverts and concrete bridge sills. In the upper <br />and lower reaches through this area, the channel is underlain by coarse <br />gravel layers, which tend to resist 'degradation. Minor amounts of bank <br />cutting occur locally along the channel during the larger flood flows. <br /> <br />Problems Relating to Water Management <br /> <br />There has been no expression of interest in obtaining water <br />storage facilities within the watershed area for irrigation, municipal, <br />or industrial uses or for recreation and wildlife purposes. The Bureau <br />of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, <br />studied the '\olatershed and made the following observation in a report <br />dated January 13, 1960: "Based on our knowledge of the area <br />and proposed developments, we believe that fish and wildlife resources <br />will not be significantly affected. The project offers no appreciable <br />opportunities for fisheries development, or for wildlife improvement." <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />The irrigated lands .in the watershed are served by the High Line <br />Canal, the Grand Valley Canal, the Mesa County Canal, and the Stub <br />Ditch. These canals, together with a fairly extensive system of open <br />drainage ditches, provide a good level of irrigation water management <br />and high crop yields. With the increasing urbanization of the <br />irrigated cropland, the principal water management need is for additional <br />land treatment measures, similar to those nOil being applied. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />;J> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />EXISTING OR PROPOSED WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br />Indian Wash Watershed lies within the Upper Grand Valley Soil <br />Conservation District. The District and its cooperators are <br />actively carrying out a soil and moisture conservation program with <br />technical assistance furnished by the Soil Conservation Service. <br />Basic conservation plans have been prepared on 17 operating units <br />containing approximately 50 percent of the irrigated cropland within <br />the. watershed. The public rangeland constituting the major portion <br />of the upper watershed area is under the jurisdiction of the U. S. <br />Bureau of Land Management and as such has a continuing program of soil <br />and moisture conservation. <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />The City of Grand Junction, the Colorado Department of Highways, <br />Mesa County, and the Grand Junction Drainage District have been working <br />jointly to improve the channel of Indian Wash downstream fram the Grand <br />Valley Canal in order to immediately reduce the added flood hazard <br />resulting fram channel constrictions which were the principal points <br />of overbank flow during the flood of June 6, 1958. Between the Grand <br />Valley Canal and the railroad, there were several constrictions where <br />the channel had less capacity than the maximum capacity (1,000 cubic <br />feet per second) of the culvert passing under the railroad classification <br />yard. <br /> <br />