FLOOD10333 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Now we are going from large to small. (slide) This is a moderate-sized diversion, (slide) this is a smaller one and (slide) that is a pretty small one indeed. Obviously it takes a complicated establishment to manage this water, since I told you that every cubic foot of water is accounted for; is owed to someone. Someone, somewhere, has to manage this. So the question is, how does that get done? Fll'St, all of this water has been allocated by date based on the time that a court of law made a decision that an individual ought to have the rights to use that water. You might be interested to know that the fIrst court-adjudicated date on the Arkansas is the first of April, 1861, and it allocates seven feet of water to the Pueblo Water Works--that's Alan Hamel's seven cubic feet of water. The latest is the 10th of February, 1939, and that doesn't allocate water to anyone but does legally permit storage in certain reservoirs. The biggest user of water is the Fort Lyon Ditch, which is authorized 900 cubic feet of water per second, and, its fll'st right is April, 1884, which means that a lot of people between 1861 and 1884 have rights to use the water prior to the time Fort Lyon gets any of it. The smallest user is Johns Manville, which has an 1890 right authorizing them to 3/10 of 1 cubic foot per second. Now, if you really want to know who has what rights, you would have to look at this chart. And, as you can see, over on the right and left columns there are dates going from 1861 all the way up to 1939. In the middle across the top are the users, and the amount they are authorized to use is in the center of that column. I can make it eve easier on you by showing you a comer of that chart. (slide) So, over in this column are the dates, up across the top are the people who are authorized to use the water and the amounts of water they are authorized to use. Look here. This one, the Canyon City Mill, is authorized 19 cubic feet in 1863 and another 3.5 cubic feet in 1864. Now that's pretty complicated. and I'm glad I'm not the guy that has to say, "You can have a bucketful, you get a wheelbarrow full, you can have all you want," and so on down the river, especially to the independent farmers who don't take these types of decisions lying down. But there is, in fact, as you might have suspected, a means by which this is indeed controlled. As I showed you, there are a number of districts. Each of these districts appoints a district manager. He has at his disposal some automated capabilities. This slide shows the automated capabilities in the river. At more than 80 spots in the river, there are data collection platforms that measure the velocity and flow of the water and can measure ph and certain other elements as well. All of the 80-plus spots measure the volume; only some of them measure the other elements. These measurements are broadcast by these stations to a satellite. The message comes back to the processing station in West Virginia, goes to the computer, is processed, then back up to another satellite and, finally, back down to receivers, one of which is probably sitting on the desk in the study of the District Manager of District 14. These satellites update his data every four hours. And, if he wants, he can produce a chart like this (slide). This chart shows the report from every station, all the numbers involved from every station and the time of the report so that the District Manager will know how much water is where and when. Unfortunately, that's the end of his automatic capability. From that point on, its a pick-up truck, rubber boots, telephone, wrench, do-it-the-hard-way kind of a process. That then explains in about 13 minutes what it took 134 years to put together in terms ofa water system. Now there will be time for questions, but there's no point in asking me any questions because I've just told you all I know about the river. Arkansas River Basin Water Forum 34 itA River of Dreams and Realities'"