My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10333
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10333
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:02 AM
Creation date
10/19/2007 11:38:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Pueblo
Community
Pueblo County
Stream Name
Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Proceedings from the Arkansas River Basin Water Forum - Jan 3-4, 1996
Date
11/3/1996
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that we need to be involved in or any program that we're going to use to comply with these rules would have to be a <br />credible program. The second goal was that the program would have to comply with the rules. However those rules <br />come out and regardless of what kind of questions we might have about them, the program would have to comply with <br />the rules. And third. our goal was to try and make use of Fry-Ark return flow waters to the extent that those waters were <br />available for well augmentation purposes. I'll talk here in a moment about how those waters might be available for use <br />in these programs. Fourth. we wanted to make sW'e that the program would be cost-effective for well owners. To the <br />extent that we can work together, we can maximize oW' effort and provide what we think is a cost-effective program. <br />Imagine having all the well owners between Pueblo and John Martin Reservoir participating in one program. lowering <br />the administrative cost and maximizing the ability of that entity to pW'chase the replacement water that is needed. So, <br />oW' goal is to try to move toward that high level of cooperation. To work together and not compete. The boards of <br />AGUA and CWPDA and the Southeast District have all at this point made a decision to support the coordinated <br />augmentation program. The Board of the Southeast District acted on the 21 st of December serving to hold together the <br />work of the prior three or foW' months and approve the operating principles of that program. <br /> <br />Let me elaborate a little bit on how we envision that program working. OW' first effort is to understand that we have a <br />resoW'ce as a conservancy district available that can be used for well augmentation purposes. We have Fry-Ark return <br />flow waters available and have in the past made some of that water available for well augmentation purposes but not to <br />the extent that we've exhausted theresoW'ce. We have on average about 15,000 acre-feet a year, an average based on <br />looking at the history of the deliveries from the Fry-Ark Project. That's a trans-mountain project that delivers beautiful <br />crisp, clear, cold water from the western slope of Colorado. So we have an available resoW'ce, and oW' goal is to make <br />that water available to individuals, to augmentation organizations and/or ditch companies. I'll elaborate on how that <br />might work here in a moment. We would ask individuals or entities to submit plans to the Southeast District by the 1st <br />of March. We're patterning oW' time-lines based on the time-lines described in the proposed rules. With their request <br />for augmentation water, we would ask that entities provide us a copy of their well augmentation plan. That could either <br />be you as an individual well owner or you as an association or group that might approach the Southeast District for use <br />of some portion of the return flow water. <br /> <br />When we receive that request for our return flow water, we'll understand a couple of things. That plan will need to have <br />other water available to it for augmentation purposes. The Fry-Ark return flows are only a component of what's going to <br />be needed for replacement purposes, and we cannot provide the full replacement requirements of a single plan or group <br />plan. Those plans would also have to meet a set of standards that have been adopted by the Southeast District. We want <br />to make sW'e that those individual plans are: (a) in compliance with the rules, honor the policies of the Southeast <br />District and, most specifically, honor the vested rights that we have with the surface holders that we have been <br />appropriating first use project water to. We refer to that as the first right of refusal provision of oW' policies. So, plans <br />would have to adhere to not only the rules but to the standards and policies of the Southeast District. Again. individuals <br />who may choose to offer up their own plan and do all the compliance work on their own. AGUA, CWPDA, LA WMA. <br />and other organizations will approach the district for an allocation of that water and/or ditch companies who may choose <br />to exercise their first right of refusal may come to the district seeking portions of that return flow water. <br /> <br />Also contained in the principles of the coordinated augmentation program is what we describe as an alliance agreement <br />between AGUA and CWPDA, LA WMA is focused on doing the work below John Martin, AGUA and CWPDA are <br />vigorous in putting together plans above John Martin to Pueblo Reservoir. We have asked them as co-signers on this <br />program to look toward consolidating into one organization in an effort to try and achieve one of oW' goals, . to see one <br />organization providing the ,services for well owners who have replacement water needs. So, a main principle of oW' <br />program conceives consolidation of those two organizations over the scope of a year. We're not sW'e how that <br />consolidation is going to work; in fact, we're not sW'e whether they are going to be strange enough bedfellows that the <br />consolidation will be a strained relationship, It may be a strange relationship too, But oW' effort is to pull together oW' <br />resoW'ces and see those two organizations merge into one, It's a first-year effort. The Board of the Southeast District as <br />well as the other co-signers of that document plan to review that at the end of the first year to gain an understanding of <br />whether it has met our goals, for compliance with the rules, and to meet the obligations as prescribed to us by the <br />Special Master of the Supreme Court. So, we will be going back to the drawing board at the end of this first year to see <br />whether we have achieved what we hoped to achieve with this coordinated augmentation program. <br /> <br />We're not the only effort out there. Hal has mentioned that he will be pW'suing legislation at the state capitol concerning <br />financial resoW'ces and enforcement resoW'ces that he feels, and we would agree, are needed to do an effective job in the <br /> <br />Arkansas River Basin Water Forum <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />itA River of Dreams and Realities" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.