Laserfiche WebLink
<br />were obtained by comparing <br />The <br /> <br />The unit costs for the opinion of probable constlUction cost <br />recent bids of current roadway construction projects located in the Front Range. <br />costs were from publicly bid projects and are adjusted based on engineer's judgment <br />where appropriate to be consistent with the level of work expected for this project <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />nvestlgations <br />, <br />On December 19, 2003, a site visit was held with EDA W, CWCB, Sear-Brown, and CTL <br />Thompson to make a visual observation of the existing soil conditions along the proposed <br />alignment. Mr. Frank Holliday, CTL Thompson. was selected to perform this review and <br />provide his conceptual level recommendations based on his knowledge of and experience <br />with the soils in this part of the Denver area. Mr. Holliday made a visual reconnaissance of <br />the types of soils present along the proposed roadway alignment to attempt to identify areas <br />of potential concern that may impact the feasibility or cost ofconstlUcting a roadway along <br />the alignment. Mr. Holliday's observations generally indicate that the soils northerly of the <br />Deer Creek crossing appear to be clay over claystone bedrock which are expansive type <br />soils, For the roadway southerly of Deer Creek appear to be a variable thickness of clays <br />overlying alluvial sands and gravels mixed with some cobbles and probably boulders. Mr. <br />Holliday provided some possible methods to deal with potential constlUction issues but did <br />not observe any geologic or geotechnical conditions that would preclude building the <br />roadway in the proposed alignment on the conceptual plan, For the complete text ofCTL <br />Thompson's observations, refer to the letter dated January 6, 2004 from CTL Thompson to <br />Sear-Brown <br /> <br />Route Selection <br />In the original concept plan there were two possible roadway alignments that were reviewed <br />by the design team. Both alignments were identical along the west side of the existing <br />reservoir to the point where the current roadway turns easterly around the southern side of <br />the reservoir towards the Platte River crossing, At this point one option was to use this <br />existing alignment and significantly raise the road\\'ay above the new water elevation and <br />effectively creating a causeway across the south end of the reservoir including a new bridge <br />crossing of the Platte River. The second option was to construct a new roadway around the <br />south end of the what would be the new r water <br />the Platte River. <br /> <br />evels and make a new crossing of <br />Both of these alignments were reviewed with State Parks and the design <br />team and it was decided by State parks that for operational concerns it would be preferable <br />to construct a new roadway around the south end of the expanded reservoir rather than to <br />build a causeway across it. To that end, a conceptual level design and cost estimate was <br />completed for only the option of extending a new roadway around the south end of the <br />expanded lake, The selected route would be a new roadway approximately 4 miles in <br />length including two new bridges <br /> <br />reservOl <br /> <br />hatlield <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />Sear-Brown was retained by The Colorado Water Conservation Board to work with EDA W <br />on the Recreational Mitigation Study and more specifically to analyze the cost impacts ofre- <br />aligning the main circulation roadway within Chatfield Park, The study consisted of several <br />meetings, discussions and on-site visits with the design team to detennine a feasible route <br />and extent of needed improvements, The product for this study was intended to be a <br />evel design for the roadway re-alignment along with an opinion of probable <br />The remainder of this study will outline the criteria utilized, <br />route selection results, conceptua evel design documents, and opinion <br />on cost <br /> <br />AnalysIs <br /> <br />Reservoir Roadway <br /> <br />conceptual <br />construction cost <br /> <br />InveStigatIOns <br />of probable construct <br /> <br />made, <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />raising the current nonnal water leve n the reservoi <br />evation of approximately 5444 per the base map drawings <br />nformation is based on the topography depicted in <br /> <br />Criteria <br /> <br />The re-alignment study is based on <br />approximately 12 feet to an e <br />created by EDA W. AI <br />EDA W base maps. <br />State Parks desires <br /> <br />freeboard above the normal water level that will <br />the roadway operatlOnat which results in a minimum roadway elevation of 5446. <br />Roadway sections are to be similar to the current Chatfield Park conditions with the <br />addition of a 4 foot wide paved shoulder for bicycle use per the request of State Parks <br />Geometric design criteria is based on design guidelines contained in "A Policy on <br />Geometric Design of Highways and Streets by American Association of State Highway <br />and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), <br />a) The roadway is assumed to be classified as a special purpose road - recreational road <br />b) A roadway section consisting of two II foot wide paved lanes, 4 foot wide paved <br />shoulders and a 10 foot wide vegetated clear zone on each side has been utilized, <br />c) The re-aligned roadway functions as a primary access roadway to the park facilities <br />and a 40 mph design speed is appropriate, Portions of the existing roadway are posted <br />at 35 mph currently. <br />d) For conceptual design purposes it is assumed that horizontal curves will be <br />superelevated to a maximum rate of 0,06 which established a minimum horizontal <br />radius for conceptual design purposes of approximately 521 feet. <br />There will be two bridge structures over the length of the re-aligned roadway, One at <br />Deer Creek and the other at the Platte River. Each structure is sized to accommodate the <br />ke trail for a total <br /> <br />keep <br /> <br />design <br /> <br />to have a 2 foot <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />de pedestrianlbi <br /> <br />roadway section plus guardrails and an 8 foot wi <br />structure width of approximately 42 feet wide. <br />Drainage structures have been located and sized based on a si <br /> <br />ng <br />of the <br /> <br />ew of eXIst <br />e\v <br /> <br />e rev <br />and a rev <br /> <br />cut verts along highway 2 (Wadsworth/Canyon Road) <br />topography along the proposed roadway alignment <br /> <br />upstream <br />existing <br /> <br />6 <br />