My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10479
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10479
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:00 AM
Creation date
10/17/2007 2:50:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Precipitaion - Frequency Maps for Colorado
Date
10/1/1967
Prepared For
Engineering Division, Coil Conservation Service
Prepared By
Special Studies Branch, Office of Hydrology
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />itation-F Values. The basic data network for <br />represents a density 0 1 station per 300 square miles. The <br />are not evenly distributed but tend to follm. population distri- <br />Consequently, the density is least in the more rugged terrain ,^1here <br />it should be greatest to properly depict the large variations in frequency <br />values that exist there. It was thus necessary to develop procedures for <br />estimating precipitation-frequency values in order to obtain some knowledge <br />of their geographic distribution in areas not represented by observations. <br /> <br />IV re <br />air <br /> <br /> <br />are politically <br />and <br /> <br /> <br />Estimatin <br />Colorado <br /> <br />stations <br />bution. <br /> <br />precipitation amounts for 6 and 24 hours the type of pre- <br />cipitation, and 2) the maximum annual 6- resulting from <br />storms which tvere entirely rain. Amounts the second series <br />were sometimes the second, third, 'fourth or even some cases the fifth <br />highest value for a particular year. Comparison of the 2- and 2S-year <br />return period amounts computed from the two series for these stations for <br />the 6- and 24-hour durations indicates that the values from the series using <br />only rainfall data are, on the average, about 10 percent smaller than the <br />series using all the data. Investigation of the geographical distribution <br />of these differences indicates that the stations on the relatively level <br />eastern portions of Colorado and Wyoming shm'l little differences between the <br />series containing rainfall data only and those containing all data. If <br />these stations were eliminated from the comparison, the average difference <br />between values from the two series increases to about IS percent with some <br />individual differences as large as 40 to 50 percent. Though no definite <br />line can be drawn separating the regions where snowfall is a definite factor <br />in producing higher frequency values, a zone of transition along the eastern <br />face of the Rocky Mountains approximating a generalized 6000-foot contour is <br />indicated from the southern Colorado border to just north of the Wyoming <br />border. <br /> <br />for <br />amounts <br />tvi thin <br /> <br />without regard <br />and 24-hour <br /> <br />included <br />in <br /> <br />Hhite. <br /> <br />method of preparing generalized precipitation-frequency maps <br />of sparse precipitation data would be one in t-1hich precipitation- <br />I <br />frequency values could be estimated for any point on the basis of orographic <br />factors. If the required relationship cannot be established, more indirect <br />procedures relating precipitation-frequency values to a combination of topo- <br />graphic parameters and normal annual or seasonal precipitation or other <br />meteorological or climatological factors whose geographic variations are <br />utilized. Since Colorado is a region of diverse topography, it was necessary <br />to divide the state into approximately homogeneous regions for the develop- <br />ment of these relations. Consideration was given in this division to <br />topography and to geographical variations in the meteorological processes <br />wnich produce precipitation in the state. <br /> <br />A preferred <br />for regions <br /> <br />Precipitation results from the lifting of moist air. Air masses with <br />sufficient moisture to produce precipitation over Colorado come from either <br />the Gulf of Mexico or the Pacific Ocean. Over the eastern portion of the <br />state, the sonrce region is almost exclusively the Gulf of Mexico. In the <br />western portion of Colorado, the primary source of moisture ,is the Pacific <br />Ocean althougb the Gulf of Mexico is a source region in some weather situ- <br />ations. The importance of the Gulf of Mexico as a moisture source for the <br />western portion of the state increases during the warm season. <br /> <br />Most of the stations used in the development of <br />maps do not take snowfall observations on a regular basis. was <br />necessary to use indirect methods to determine frequency values that <br />be obtained if a series of rainfall only values were used for each station. <br />Attempts to determine the type of precipitation occurr1ng at individual <br />stations from maximum or minimum temperature at individual stations or <br />hourly temperature readings at nearby stations lead to large uncertainties <br />for many large precipitation amounts. Since most snowfall occurs during the <br />colder half year, a series containing only values for the Hay to October <br />season was compared with the series which was based upon rainfall only. The <br />two series were in good agreement with a very slight bias toward higher <br />values for the May to October season. This bias results from some large <br />ronounts in late October and early May occurring as snow and thus they were <br />excluded from the rainfall only series. This average difference is slight, <br />only about 4 percent, with no consistent preference toward higher elevations <br />or particular geographic regions. <br /> <br />the rainfall-frequency <br />It therefore <br />would <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Relations For Annual Maps. Relations were <br />estimates of the 2-year 24-hour precipitation. <br />topography and consideration of the storm types that cause large 24-hour <br />precipitation amounts suggested separate consideration of the regions east <br />and west of the Continental Divide. East of the Continental Divide, Colorado <br />includes the eastern-facing slopes of the Rocky Mountains, where orography <br />plays an important part in producing precipitation, and the relatively flat <br />region east of approximately Denver and Pueblo, where the terrain plays <br /> <br />to provide <br />the <br /> <br />first developed <br />Examination of <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Since these investigations indicate that frequency values computed <br />an annual series of rainfall values only would be different from those <br />composed of all precipitation values, two separate sets of precipitation- <br />frequency maps were developed. The first set consists of annual-maps based <br />on precipitation data from all months of the year without regard to the type <br />of precipitation; rain, rain and snow mixed, all snow, hail, etc. The <br />second series takes precipitation values from the months of May through <br />October. No attempt was made in this second series to differentiate between <br />types of precipitation occurring within these months but the investigations <br />mentioned in the preceeding paragraph indicate that these maps will approxi- <br />mate the values that would be obtained by using an annual series of rainfall <br />only. Since data for only part of the year were utilized, these maps have <br />been labeled with the appropriate probabilities rather than with a return <br />period in years <br /> <br />from <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.