My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
IntermtntClimateSummaryJune2006
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
DayForward
>
IntermtntClimateSummaryJune2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2011 3:43:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2007 12:15:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
Intermountain West Climate Summary
Date
6/22/2006
Description
Water Availability Task Force Meeting Presentation
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
Presentation
Document Relationships
IntermountainWestClimateSummary
(Attachment)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\Backfile
IntermtnClimateSummaryJan2006
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
IntermtnClimateSummaryJan2008
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />FEATURE ARTICLE FROM INTERMOUNTAIN WEST CLIMATE SUMMARY, JUNE 2006 <br /> <br />New Streamflow Reconstructions for the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin: Placing Recent Droughts into a Centuries-Long Context <br /> <br />By Connie A. Woodhouse 1, Eileen McKim2, and Andrea Ray3 <br /> <br />This article is a summary of a paper published in May 2006 in Water Resources Research, "Updated streamflow reconstructions <br />for the Upper Colorado River Basin. " The paper s authors are Connie Woodhouse of the NOAA/NCDC, who is a participant in <br />the Western Water Assessment, Stephen Gray, formerly of USGS, now the Wyoming State Climatologist, and David Meko, of the <br />University of Arizona and who is a participant in the Climate Assessment of the Southwest. <br /> <br />Over the past several decades, scientists have developed <br />reconstructions of annual streamflow for centuries prior to the <br />streamflow gage record using data from tree rings. These recon- <br />structions are useful for assessing a broader range of hydrologic <br />variability than contained in the gage records (Figure la). The <br />Colorado River at Lees Ferry was the first tree-ring based quanti- <br /> <br /> 35000 <br /> 30000 <br /> 25000 <br />:2 <br />U 20000 <br />~ <br />'i 1 5000 <br />0 <br />iI <br /> 1 0000 <br /> 5000 <br /> 0 <br /> 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 <br /> <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />Figure 1 a. Comparison of observed and reconstructed streamflow, <br />Lees Ferry gauge (blue line) and Lees-A reconstruction (red line), <br />1906-1997 (gauge to 1995). Figures 1-3 are reproduced from <br />WGM (2006), see the article for details. <br /> <br />tative reconstruction of streamflow (Stockton and Jacoby, 1976). <br />Lees Ferry is the gage that reflects flo\;vs for the Upper Colorado <br />River basin under the 1922 Colorado Compact. The Stockton <br />and Jacoby reconstruction of the annual flows from 1520 to 1961 <br />contained several important findings, including that the high- <br />est sustained flows in the entire record occurred in the first part <br />of the 20th century, the period upon which the Colorado River <br />Compact of 1922 was negotiated, while the most persistent and <br />severe drought occurred in the late 16th century. <br />In a paper published in May 2006, Woodhouse and co-au- <br />thors (2006) updated the Stockton and Jacoby reconstruction at <br />Lees Ferry using an expanded tree-ring net\;vork and a longer <br />gage record for the calibration of the reconstruction. They also <br />developed streamflo\;v reconstructions for three key gages in the <br />Upper Colorado River basin: the Green River at Green River, <br />Utah; Colorado near Cisco, Utah; and San Juan near Bluff, Utah <br /> <br />(Figure Ib). The reconstructions explain 72-81 % of the vari- <br />ance in the gage records, and results are relatively stable across <br />several reconstruction methodologies. The new reconstruction of <br />Lees Ferry flows suggests a slightly higher long-term mean than <br />Stockton and Jacoby's, but confirms the earlier findings that Col- <br />orado River allocations were based on one of the wettest periods <br />in the past five centuries, while droughts more severe than any <br />20th-21st century event have occurred in the past. In addition, <br />five-year droughts similar to the drought of 2000-2004 (in terms <br />of average flow) appear to have occurred as many an eight times <br />in the past five centuries. Analyses indicate similar patterns of <br />runoff variations across the Green, Colorado main stem and San <br />Juan sub-basins, indicating that drought tends to occur across the <br />entire upper basin. <br /> <br />1130 <br /> <br />1110 <br /> <br />1050 <br /> <br />1090 <br /> <br />1070 <br /> <br />ARIZONA <br /> <br /> <br />370 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />------__1 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />l._ <br /> <br />_ 430 <br /> <br />IDAHO <br /> <br />UTAH <br /> <br />410 <br /> <br />390 <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />Figure 1 b. Location of gages at Green River at Green River, <br />Utah (A), Colorado River near Cisco, Utah (B), San Juan Riv- <br />er near Bluff, Utah (C), and Lees Ferry, Arizona (D) (dots) and <br />tree-ring chronologies (triangles). The upper Colorado River <br />basin is outlined in a solid line, and the Green, Colorado with <br />Yampa and Gunnison, and San Juan sub-basins are outlined <br />by the dotted lines. <br /> <br />1 NOAA/National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2CIRES, 3NOAA/ESRL, all in Boulder, CO <br /> <br />FEATURE ARTICLE I 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.